The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the quality of urban life:

a systematized literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v19i1.2166

Keywords:

Quality of life, Quality of urban life, Impact, Covid-19 pandemic, Systematized literature review

Abstract

This paper aims to verify how the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the quality of urban life is being treated in the present scientific literature. Data for the research were collected on the Capes Periodicals Portal, using a search string that contained the keywords “urban quality of life”, “impact” and “Covid-19 pandemic” and its variants, and a temporal filter from 2020 to 2022. It was concluded that the concept of quality of urban life is broad and multidimensional and its operationalization depends on the scope that the study intends to address.

Author Biographies

Andriele da Silva Panosso, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Doctoral student in the Urban and Regional Planning post-graduate program at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. She has a Master's in Civil Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Maria, in 2015, and a Bachelor's in Architecture and Urban planning, from the same university, in 2010. 

Luciana Inês Gomes Miron, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Architect and Urban Planner from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (1994), Master (2002), and Ph.D. (2008), from the Graduate Program in Civil Engineering at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Associate Professor at the Department of Architecture (since 2006) and the Postgraduate Program in Urban and Regional Planning at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (since 2011). 

References

SHARIFI, A.; KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of the Total Environment, v. 749, p. 1–3, 2020.

FELCE, D.; PERRY, J. Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, v. 16, n. 1, p. 51–74, 1995.

HERCULANO, S. C. A qualidade de vida e seus indicadores. In: HERCULANO, S.; PORTO, M. F. DE S.; FREITAS, C. M. DE (Eds.). . Qualidade de Vida e Riscos Ambientais. Niterói: Eduff, 2000.

MONTEIRO, D. A. DE B. Proposta de um método para avaliação da qualidade de vida urbana e da sustentabilidade de bairros brasileiros. 2020. 512 f. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 2020.

DELLER, S. C.; DISSART, J. C. Quality of Life in the Planning Literature. Journal of Planning Literature, v. 15, n. 1, p. 135–161, 2015.

NAHAS, M. I. P. Indicadores de qualidade de vida urbana: aspectos teórico-metodológicos. In: Qualidade de vida urbana: Abordagens, indicadores e experiências internacionais. Belo Horizonte: C/Arte, 2015. p. 184.

NAHAS, M. I. P. et al. Metodologia de construçao do índice de qualidade de vida urbana dos municípios brasileiros (IQVU-BR). XV Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais. Anais...Caxambu, MG: 2006

LORA, E.; POWELL, A. A New Way of Monitoring the Quality of Urban Life in Latin America. In: RODGERS, D.; BEALL, J.; KANBUR, R. (Eds.). . Latin American Urban Development into the 21st Century. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2012. p. 227–256.

WESZ, J. G. B. Urban Quality of Life: Multidimensional Evaluation in Porto Alegre , Brazil (Qualidade de Vida Urbana: Avaliação Multidimensional em Porto Alegre, Brasil). 2021. 290 f. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. 2021.

MCCREA, R.; SHYY, T. K.; STIMSON, R. What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, v. 1, n. 1, p. 79–96, 2006.

COCCO, R. G.; COLLISCHONN, E.; MEURER, M. Relações entre a distribuição espacial da COVID-19 e a dinâmica de interações espaciais no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. HYGEIA Revista Brasileira de Geografia Médica e da Saúde, v. Edição esp, n. Junho, p. 183–192, 2020.

GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91–108, 2009.

SASSEN, S.; KOURTIT, K. A post-corona perspective for smart cities: ‘should i stay or should i go?’ Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 17, p. 9988, 6 set. 2021.

LÓPEZ-RUIZ, V.-R. R. et al. The relationship between happiness and quality of life: A model for Spanish society. PLoS ONE, v. 16, n. 11 November, p. 1–15, 3 nov. 2021.

PETROVIČ, F. et al. Description Relationship between Urban Space and Quality of Urban Life. A Geographical Approach. Land, v. 10, n. 12, p. 1337, 4 dez. 2021.

ZIÓŁKOWSKA-WEISS, K. Satisfaction with selected indicators of the quality of urban space by polonia in the greater Toronto area. Land, v. 10, n. 8, p. 778, 24 jul. 2021.

AOUAD, D.; KALOUSTIAN, N. Sustainable beirut city planning post august 2020 port of beirut blast: Case study of karantina in medawar district. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 11, p. 6442, 5 jun. 2021.

MERCADER-MOYANO, P.; MORAT-PÉREZ, O.; MUÑOZ-GONZÁLEZ, C. Housing evaluation methodology in a situation of social poverty to guarantee sustainable cities: The satisfaction dimension for the case of Mexico. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 20, p. 11199, 12 out. 2021.

HERRERA-LIMONES, R. et al. Tools for the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the Design of an Urban Environmental and Healthy Proposal. A Case Study. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 6431, v. 13, n. 11, p. 6431, 5 jun. 2021.

RINK, D.; SCHMIDT, C. Afforestation of urban brownfields as a nature-based solution. Experiences from a project in leipzig (germany). Land, v. 10, n. 9, p. 893, 25 ago. 2021.

TYSEK, J. S. et al. Attractiveness of cities during social isolation: Views of residents of the silesian voivodeship (Poland). Economy of Region, v. 16, n. 4, p. 1272–1284, 1 jan. 2020.

SYRBE, R.-U. U. et al. The Value of Urban Nature in Terms of Providing Ecosystem Services Related to Health and Well-Being: An Empirical Comparative Pilot Study of Cities in Germany and the Czech Republic. Land 2021, Vol. 10, Page 341, v. 10, n. 4, p. 341, 27 mar. 2021.

CRISTIANO, S.; ZILIO, S. Whose Health in Whose City? A Systems Thinking Approach to Support and Evaluate Plans, Policies, and Strategies for Lasting Urban Health. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 12225, v. 13, n. 21, p. 12225, 5 nov. 2021.

FU, R. et al. The Relationship between Urban Vibrancy and Built Environment: An Empirical Study from an Emerging City in an Arid Region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 525, v. 18, n. 2, p. 525, 10 jan. 2021.

CORREA-PARRA, J.; VERGARA-PERUCICH, J. F.; AGUIRRE-NUÑEZ, C. Towards a Walkable City: Principal Component Analysis for Defining Sub-Centralities in the Santiago Metropolitan Area. Land, v. 9, n. 10, p. 362, 30 set. 2020.

SEVTSUK, A.; BASU, R.; CHANCEY, B. We shape our buildings, but do they then shape us? A longitudinal analysis of pedestrian flows and development activity in Melbourne. PLoS ONE, v. 16, n. 9, p. e0257534–e0257534, 21 set. 2021.

MOROZOVA, I. A.; YATSECHKO, S. S. The Risks of Smart Cities and the Perspectives of Their Management Based on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Interests of Sustainable Development. Risks 2022, Vol. 10, Page 34, v. 10, n. 2, p. 34, 2 fev. 2022.

Published

2022-11-07

How to Cite

PANOSSO, Andriele da Silva; MIRON, Luciana Inês Gomes. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the quality of urban life: : a systematized literature review. In: NATIONAL MEETING OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, 19., 2022. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2022. p. 1–10. DOI: 10.46421/entac.v19i1.2166. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/entac/article/view/2166. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.