SUSTENTABILIDADE NA CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA COM META-ANÁLISE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v18i.994Keywords:
Management, Construction industry, Sustainability, Systematic literature reviewAbstract
n addition to creating value and jobs, the construction industry uses a considerable amount of resources with severe consequences for the environment. The keywords construction management and sustainab* were used to extract articles from the Web of Science database, resulting in a total of 2,655. The aim was to investigate studies on the quantitative methodologies of sustainability in construction. Mixed methods were applied for bibliometry, with PRISMA methodology (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analysis) to conduct a quantitative bibliometric search and subsequently assess the articles included using qualitative methods. These studies were subdivided into three groups: sustainability in construction, environmental aspects and others. VOSviewer software was used in the quantitative analysis of documents, institutions and the most referenced journals. The results demonstrated that the first articles related to the topic were published in 1993, and that only 2.54% of the studies used quantitative methodologies to assess the sustainability of the construction industry.
References
ARAÚJO, Adolpho Guido; PEREIRA CARNEIRO, Arnaldo Manoel; PALHA, Rachel Perez.
Sustainable construction management: A systematic review of the literature with metaanalysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 256, p. 120350, 2020. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120350>BANIHASHEMI, Saeed et al. Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 6, p. 1103–1119, 2017. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.014>ECK, Nees Jan Van; WALTMAN, Ludo. VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden, [s. l.], n. August, p. 1–51, 2018.
HERNÁNDEZ-MORENO, Silverio; DE HOYOS-MARTÍNEZ, Jesús. INDICATORS OF URBAN SUSTAINABILITY IN MEXICO. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 16, p. 46–61, 2010.
HOSSEINI, M. Reza et al. Sustainable Delivery of Megaprojects in Iran: Integrated Model of Contextual Factors. Journal of Management in Engineering, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 2, p. 05017011, 2017.
ISO 15392. Sustainability in building construction — General principlesGeneva, Switzerland, 2008. p. 20.
ISO 21929-1. Sustainability in building construction — Sustainability indicators —Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. International Journal of Surgery, [s. l.], v. 8, p. 336–341, 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21603045%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3090117>PLUYE, Pierre; NHA HONG, Quan. Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews. Annu. Rev. Health, [s. l.], v. 35, p. 29–45, 2013.
RUMANE, Abdul Razzak. Quality Management in CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Second ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2017. Disponível em: <https://lccn.loc.gov/2017019041>.
