Design para Adaptabilidade e Desmontagem (DfAD): critérios para tornar as edificações banco de materiais
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v19i1.1958Palavras-chave:
Economia circular, Construção civil, Desconstrução, DfAD, Fim de vida da edificaçãoResumo
O Design para Adaptabilidade e Desmontagem (DfAD) é um método para reduzir a geração de resíduos de construção e demolição e o uso de recursos naturais na construção. É uma estratégia pouco explorada devido à falta de diretrizes padronizadas para orientar a desconstrução de edifícios. Por meio de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, este estudo levantou 69 critérios do DfAD para orientar a desconstrução dos edifícios, enfatizando a padronização, modularização e pré-fabricação de materiais e componentes de construção. A implementação do DfAD necessita de maior conhecimento, o estabelecimento de políticas públicas e o desenvolvimento de ferramentas circulares no setor construtivo.
Referências
AJAYI, Saheed et al. Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 102, p. 101-112, 2015.
ANASTASIADES, Kostas et al. Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learnt from a critical literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 117, p. 109522, 2020.
DORSTHORST, Bart, KOWALCZYK, Ton. Design for recycling, in: Chini, A.R., Schultmann, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 70–80, 2002.
DURMISEVIC, Elma. Circular economy in construction design strategies for reversible buildings. BAMB, 2019.
ELO, Satu; KYNGÄS, Helvi. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, v. 62, n. 1, p. 107-115, 2008.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA). Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization, 2015.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 20887 Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works — Design for disassembly and adaptability, 2020.
KIBERT, Charles. Deconstruction: the start of a sustainable materials strategy for the built environment. Industry and environment, v. 26, n. 2, p. 84-88, 2003.
KIRCHHERR, Julian; REIKE, Denise; HEKKERT, Marko. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, v. 127, p. 221-232, 2017.
MACOZOMA, Dennis. Understanding the concept of flexibility in design for deconstruction. Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse. University of Karlsruhe Karlsruhe, Germany: CIB Publication, v. 272, 2002.
MUNARO, Mayara Regina; TAVARES, Sérgio Fernando; BRAGANÇA, Luís. Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 260, p. 121134, 2020.
MUNARO, Mayara Regina; TAVARES, Sergio Fernando; BRAGANÇA, Luís. The ecodesign methodologies to achieve buildings’ deconstruction: A review and framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022.
TORRACO, Richard. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005.
TRANFIELD, David; DENYER, David; SMART, Palminder. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207-222, 2003.
WHITTEMORE, Robin; KNAFL, Kathleen. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546-553, 2005.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (EMF). Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains, Geneva, 2014.
