Estratégias de produção para plataformas de produto na construção integrada modular
oportunidades e diretrizes iniciais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/sibragec.v14i.6786Palavras-chave:
Construção Modular, Plataforma de Produto, Cadeia de suprimentos, Estratégia de produçãoResumo
Construção integrada Modular (CiM) é uma abordagem da construção que permite a entrega de produtos com melhor custo, prazo e qualidade por meio da industrialização e padronização. Entretanto, clientes podem solicitar customizações para atingir soluções inovadoras e valores desejados. Neste sentido, Plataformas de Produto (PPs) são recomendadas para fornecer variedade de produtos para diferentes demandas do mercado, utilizando sistemas de produção em escala. Implementações exitosas de PPs requerem que as estratégias de produção migrem do tradicional e dominante Engineer-to-order (ETO) para outras variantes. Porém, estratégias de produção distintas do ETO são comuns em outras indústrias, mas ainda pouco utilizadas na construção civil. Assim, o objetivo deste artigo é levantar as diferentes estratégias de produção para PPs na CiM e propor diretrizes para sua aplicação na indústria da construção, focando na relação com fornecedores da cadeia de suprimentos. Para isso, foi realizado um Mapeamento Sistemático da Literatura, processo recomendado para coleta e síntese de evidências de tópicos de pesquisa ainda pouco explorados. Posteriormente, as informações coletadas na literatura foram discutidas com gestores de empresas que adotam a CiM, para proposição das diretrizes. Os resultados contribuem para a estruturação do processo de adoção da CiM por empresas incorporadoras e construtoras.
Downloads
Referências
BONEV, M.; WÖRÖSCH, M.; HVAM, L. Utilizing platforms in industrialized construction: A case study of a precast manufacturer. Construction Innovation, v. 15, n. 1, p. 84–106, 2015.
CAO, J. et al. Cross-phase product configurator for modular buildings using kit-of-parts. Automation in Construction, v. 123, 2021.
CHEN, Q. et al. Exploiting digitalization for the coordination of required changes to improve engineer-to-order materials flow management. Construction Innovation, v. 22, n. 1, p. 76–100, 2022.
ELGH, F. et al. Platform models for agile customization – what’s beyond modularization? (Peruzzini M. et al., Eds.)Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. Anais... Em: ADVANCES IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING. IOS Press BV, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85057963770&doi=10.3233%2f978-1-61499-898-3-371&partnerID=40&md5=783fc397d1eb81d7cdee2e6066faa0f1>
FORSMAN, S. et al. Need for innovation in supplying engineer-to-order joinery products to construction: A case study in Sweden. Construction Innovation, v. 12, n. 4, p. 464–491, 2012.
HVAM, Lars et al. A framework for determining product modularity levels. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, v. 9, n. 10, p. 168781401771942, out. 2017.
JANSSON, G.; JOHNSSON, H.; ENGSTRÖM, D. Platform use in systems building. Construction Management and Economics, v. 32, n. 1–2, p. 70–82, fev. 2014.
JENSEN, P.; OLOFSSON, T.; JOHNSSON, H. Configuration through the parameterization of building components. Automation in Construction, v. 23, p. 1–8, maio 2012.
JIANG, W. et al. Modelling of pricing, crashing, and coordination strategies of prefabricated construction supply Chain with power structure. PLOS ONE, v. 18, n. 8, 10 ago. 2023.
JOHNSSON, H. Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building: Exploring product development platforms. Construction Management and Economics, v. 31, n. 9, p. 941–958, 2013.
JOHNSSON, H.; JANSSON, G.; JENSEN, P. Modularization in a housing platform for mass customization. (Smith S.D., Ahiaga-Dagbui D.D., Eds.) Anais... Em: PROCEEDINGS 29TH ANNUAL ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCHERS IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ARCOM 2013. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84981360254&partnerID=40&md5=ee750c1891ecb069b56a78e39f756708>
JONSSON, H.; RUDBERG, M. Classification of production systems for industrialized building: a production strategy perspective. Construction Management and Economics, v. 32, n. 1–2, p. 53–69, 1 fev. 2014.
KITCHENHAM, B. A. Systematic review in software engineering: where we are and where we should be going. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies. Anais...: EAST ’12.New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 22 set. 2012. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1145/2372233.2372235>. Acesso em: 31 jan. 2025
LAMPEL, J.; MINTZBERG, H. Customizing Customization. Sloan Manage. Rev. 1996, 38, 21–30.
LANGSTON, C.; ZHANG, W. DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 16, p. 9219, 17 ago. 2021.
LENNARTSSON, M.; ANDRÉ, S.; ELGH, F. PLM support for design platforms in industrialized house-building. Construction Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 265–286, 2023.
MARKWORTH JOHNSEN, S. H.; KRISTJANSDOTTIR, K.; HVAM, L. Improving product configurability in ETO companies. (Kim H. et al., Eds.). Anais... Em: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, ICED. Design Society, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029811244&partnerID=40&md5=8cc99f408b9aabe6a7401ee188d31e30>
MATT, D. T.; DALLASEGA, P.; RAUCH, E. On-site oriented capacity regulation for fabrication shops in Engineer-to-Order companies (ETO). (Teti R., D. of C. University of Naples Federico II Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, Fraunhofer Joint Laboratory of Excellence on Advanced Production Technology (Fh-J_LEAPT), P. le Tecchio 80, Naples, Eds.)Procedia CIRP. Anais... Em: PROCEDIA CIRP. Elsevier, 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84939802796&doi=10.1016%2fj.procir.2015.06.036&partnerID=40&md5=0420bccf471d0e69bd7a3f9dfed58962>
MATT, D. T.; DALLASEGA, P.; RAUCH, E. Synchronization of the manufacturing process and on-site installation in ETO companies. Procedia CIRP. Anais... Em: PROCEDIA CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904472010&doi=10.1016%2fj.procir.2014.01.058&partnerID=40&md5=55a32c34173a53bd24ded02fbebad3b9>
MONTALI, J. et al. Knowledge-Based Engineering in the design for manufacture of prefabricated façades: current gaps and future trends. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, v. 14, n. 1–2, p. 78–94, 2018.
NOGUCHI, M. A Choice Model for Mass Customization of Lower-Cost and HigherPerformance Housing in Sustainable Development. Montreal, 2004. 367 f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture) – School of Architecture, McGill University, Montreal, 2004.
PAN, W.; HON, C. K. Modular integrated construction for high-rise buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, v. 173, n. 2, p. 64–68, out. 2018.
PAN, W.; ZHANG, Z.; YANG, Y. Briefing: Bringing clarity and new understanding of smart and modular integrated construction. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction, v. 173, n. 1, p. 175–179, 1 mar. 2020.
PELTOKORPI, A. et al. Categorizing modularization strategies to achieve various objectives of building investments. Construction Management and Economics, v. 36, n. 1, p. 32–48, 2 jan. 2018.
PETERSEN, K. et al. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. . Em: 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (EASE). 1 jun. 2008. Disponível em: <https://scienceopen.com/document?vid=6d552894-2cc3-4e2b-a483-41fa48a37ef8>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2023
PINE, B. J.; PEPPER, D.; ROGERS, M. Do You Want to Keep Your Customers Forever? Harvard Business Review, 1995
POPOVIC, D.; ELGH, F.; HEIKKINEN, T. Configuration of flexible volumetric elements using product platforms: Information modeling method and a case study. Automation in Construction, v. 126, 2021.
POPOVIC, D.; RAUDBERGET, D.; ELGH, F. Product Platforms in Industrialized House Building - Information Modeling Method. (K. Safsten, F. Elgh, Eds.)Jonkoping University. Anais... Em: SPS2020. 2020.
POPOVIC, D.; SCHAUERTE, T.; ELGH, F. Product platform alignment in industrialised house building. Wood Material Science and Engineering, v. 17, n. 6, p. 572–585, 2022.
POWELL, D. et al. A new set of principles for pursuing the lean ideal in engineer-To-order manufacturers. Procedia CIRP. Anais... Em: PROCEDIA CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904460379&doi=10.1016%2fj.procir.2014.01.137&partnerID=40&md5=97300e6d48a4b394179fea089ce5f9c4>
ROBERTSON, D.; ULRICH, K. Planning for Product Platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, p. 19–31, 15 jul. 1998.
SHAHZAD, W. M. et al. Benefits, constraints and enablers of modular offsite construction (MOSC) in New Zealand high-rise buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. ahead-of-print, n. ahead-of-print, 1 jan. 2023.
SMITH, R. E. Off-Site and Modular Construction Explained. National Institute of Building Sciences, 2016.
STEINHARDT, D. et al. The structure of emergent prefabricated housing industries: a comparative case study of Australia and Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, v. 38, n. 6, p. 483–501, 2 jun. 2020.
TAUBE, J.; HIROTA, E. H. Customização em massa no processo de provisão de Habitações de Interesse Social: um estudo de caso. Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 4, p. 253-268, out./dez. 2017. ISSN 1678-8621 Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212017000400196
THAJUDEEN, S.; LENNARTSSON, M.; ELGH, F. Expanding the Building System into a Product Platform for Improved Design and Manufacture - A Case Study in Industrialised House-Building. (Safsten K., Elgh F., Eds.)Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. Anais... Em: ADVANCES IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING. IOS Press BV, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098639964&doi=10.3233%2fATDE200172&partnerID=40&md5=3fa87916b86d117e218c9e84c06b4627>
VIANA, D.; TOMMELEIN, I.; FORMOSO, C. USING MODULARITY TO REDUCE COMPLEXITY OF INDUSTRIALIZED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: A CASE STUDY. (Hashemi A., S. of E. and T. University of Brighton Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, Eds.)ZEMCH. Anais... Em: ZEMCH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. ZEMCH Network, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85202030068&partnerID=40&md5=6baa0bb6e84dd0de916464b92792a9c6>
VOORDIJK, H.; MEIJBOOM, B.; DE HAAN, J. Modularity in supply chains: a multiple case study in the construction industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 26, n. 6, p. 600–618, 1 jun. 2006.
VRIJHOEF, R.; KOSKELA, L. Revisiting the three peculiarities of production in construction. Int. Group Lean Constr. Conf.: Proc. Anais... Em: 13TH INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE: PROCEEDINGS. 2005. Disponível em: <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84866076650&partnerID=40&md5=e8137774c8983470ba20faadadeeaff8>
VRIJHOEF, R.; KOSKELA, L. The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, v. 6, n. 3–4, p. 169–178, dez. 2000.
WINCH, G. Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction. Building Research & Information, v. 31, n. 2, p. 107–118, jan. 2003.
WOHLIN, C. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Anais... Em: EASE ’14: 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING. London England United Kingdom: ACM, 13 maio 2014. Disponível em: <https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2601248.2601268>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2023
WUNI, I. Y.; SHEN, G. Q. Towards a decision support for modular integrated construction: an integrative review of the primary decision-making actors. International Journal of Construction Management, v. 22, n. 5, p. 929–948, 15 abr. 2022.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE GESTÃO E ECONOMIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
