Conforto ergonômico e acessibilidade em campi universitários
uma revisão sistemática de literatura a favor da caminhabilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/encac.v17i1.4379Keywords:
accessibility, university environments, circulation structures.Abstract
Taking into account the wide range of attributions existing in university environments, which often make them complex, special attention is needed with regard to accessibility and circulation structures. Within this scenario of inclusion dealt with in this work, the importance of accessibility in the circulation structures of universities for the university's relationship with its users was addressed. This article is yet another study focused on the accessibility of circulation structures in university environments and is part of one of the parts of the master's research by one of the authors. For the construction of the research, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out using the databases: Web of Science and Scopus, with search strings of national and international scientific production of the last 5 years, in addition to consulting NBR 9050 (2020) as a definition for technical criteria and parameters, mobility conditions and perception of the environment. In view of this research, the importance of accessibility in university environments is pointed out, not only as a tool for inclusion and well-being, but, above all, to allow the right of people to exercise their citizenship in a comfortable and safe way.
References
ABDULLAH, W. S. Optimizing social sustainability in walkable university campus: A comparison between the old and new campuses of Sulaimani University. Amazonia Investiga, v. 9, n. 34, p. 44-56, 2020.
ARELLANA, J.; ALVAREZ, V.; OVIEDO, D.; GUZMAN, L. A. Walk this way: Pedestrian accessibility and equity in Barranquilla and Soledad, Colombia. Research in Transportation Economics, v. 86, 101024, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101024.
_____. NBR 9050: Acessibilidade a edificações, mobiliário, espaços e equipamentos urbanos. Rio de Janeiro. 2020.
BAOBEID, A.; KOÇ, M.; AL-GHAMDI, S. G. Walkability and its relationships with health, sustainability, and livability: Elements of physical environment and evaluation frameworks. Frontiers Built Environment, v. 7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218.
BRASIL. LEI No 10.098, DE 19 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2000. Estabelece normas gerais e critérios básicos para a promoção da acessibilidade das pessoas portadoras de deficiência ou com mobilidade reduzida, e dá outras providências. Brasília, 19 de dez. 2000. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l10098.htm. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2023.
CHEN, L.; LU, Y.; YE, Y.; XIAO, Y.; YANG, L. Examining the association between the built environment and pedestrian volume using street view images. Cities, v. 127, 2022, 103734, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103734.
DE VOS, J.; LAETTMAN, K.; VAN DER VLUGT, A.; WELSCH, J.; OTSUKA, N. Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda. Transport Reviews, v. 43, n. 2, 2023, p. 303-324, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2022.2101072.
FERNANDES, P.; SOUSA, C.; MACEDO, J.; COELHO, M. C. How to evaluate the extent of mobility strategies in a university campus: An integrated analysis of impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, v. 14, n. 2, 2020, p. 120-136, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1531183.
FERRARI, G.; WERNECK, A. O.; SILVA, D. R. da; KOVALSKYS, I.; GOMEZ, G.; RIGOTTI, A.; SANABRIA, L. Y. C.; GARCIA, M. C. Y.; PAREJA, R. G.; HERRERA-CUENCA, M.; ZIMBERG, I. Z.; GUAJARDO, V.; PRATT, M.; BOLADOS, C. C.; SALDÍA, E. J.; PIRES, C.; MARQUES, A.; PERALTA, M.; VICTO, E. R. de; FISBERG, M. Association between perceived neighborhood built environment and walking and cycling for transport among inhabitants from Latin America: The Elans study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, v. 17, n. 18, 6858, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/Ijerph17186858.
FONSECA, F.; FERNANDES, E.; RAMOS, R. Walkable cities: Using the smart pedestrian net method for evaluating a pedestrian network in Guimarães, Portugal. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 16, 10306, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610306
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS. Resumo Técnico Censo da Educação Superior 2021. Estado Distrito Federal, Brasília. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/resumo_tecnico_censo_da_educacao_superior_2021.pdfAcesso em: 24 abr. 2023.
INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA) - Associação Internacional de Ergonomia. What is Ergonomics? Disponível em: https://iea.cc/about/what-is-ergonomics/ Acesso em: 24 abr. 2023.
IKUDAYISIE, A. E.; TAIWO, A. A. Accessibility and inclusive use of public spaces within the city-centre of Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Place Management and Development, v. 15, n. 3, 2022, p. 316-335, DOI: 10.1108/JPMD-08-2020-0077.
MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO. Programa Incluir. 2005. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/programa-incluir. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2023.
MIRANDA, A. S.; FAN, Z.; DUARTE, F.; RATTI, C. Desirable streets: using deviations in pedestrian trajectories to measure the value of the built environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, v. 86, 101563, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101563.
ORTEGA, E.; MARTÍN, B.; ISIDRO, Á.; CUEVAS-WIZNER, R. Street walking quality of the ‘Centro’ district, Madrid. Journal of Maps, v. 16, n. 1, 2020, p. 184-194, DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2020.1829114.
PARASKEVOPOULOS, Y.; TSIGDINOS, S.; ANDRAKAKOU, M. Associating walkability features with pedestrian activity in a central Athens neighborhood. European Journal of Geography, n. 11, v. 4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.y.par.11.4.179.194.
RAMAKRESHNAN, L.; FONG, C. S.; SULAIMAN, N. M.; AGHAMOHAMMADI, N. Motivations and built environment factors associated with campus walkability in the tropical settings. Science of the Total Environment, v. 749, n. 141457, 2020.
SAGHAPOUR, T.; MORIDPOUR, S.; THOMPSON, R. Sustainable transport in neighbourhoods: effect of accessibility on walking and bicycling. Transportmetrica A Transport Science, v. 15, n. 2, 2019, p. 849-871, ISSN 2324-9935, https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1540502.
TEIXEIRA NEVES, C. E.; SILVA, A. R. da; ARRUDA, F. S. de. Exploring the link between built environment and walking choice in São Paulo city, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 93, 103064, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103064.
WANG, D.; BROWN, G.; LIU, Y.; MATEO-BABIANO, I. A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use. Cities, v. 42, 2015, p. 85–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.003.
ZANNAT, K. E.; ADNAN, M. S. G.; DEWAN, A. GIS-based approach to evaluating environmental influences on active and public transport accessibility of university students. Journal of Urban Management, v. 9, n. 3, 2020, p. 331-346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.06.001.
ZUMELZU, A.; HERRMANN-LUNECKE, M. G. Mental well-being and the influence of place: conceptual approaches for the built environment for planning healthy and walkable cities. Sustainability, v. 13, 6395, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116395.
ZUMELZU, A.; ESTRADA, M.; JARA, C.; PENA, C. Effects of the built environment on pedestrian accessibility in neighbourhoods in southern Chile. The case of Temuco, Chile. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, v. 503, 012093, 2020, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/503/1/012093.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CONFORTO NO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
