PRINCIPAIS FALHAS NO PLANEJAMENTO DE MÉDIO PRAZO DE OBRAS: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v17i1.1504Palavras-chave:
Medium term planning, Last Planner System (LPS ), Construction project planningResumo
Construction production systems have intrinsic characteristics that make them complex systems that require the use of efficient processes to assure project performance goals are met. Planning and control systems like the Last Planner System of Production Control (LPS ), which define different planning levels, are employed to address these issues. The mediumterm level (MTL), which is essential to assure plans are executed as planned at the master (milestone) schedule level, is one of these levels. This paper uses a theoretical-conceptual approach based on a structured literature review aiming at identifying the main shortcomings related to MTL use in construction projects. Results indicate inefficiencies in the way it is used, and the most common ones include improperly developing/implementing MTL plans, failure to connect the MPL with different planning levels, failure to identify and remove constraints, and lack of indicators to evaluate the MPL performance. In summary, additional research is needed to support the efficient use of MTL in construction projects, especially considering that the MPL plays an important role to remove constraints that impact activities and promote continuous flow, which are essential to achieving project goals related to time, cost, quality, and safety.
Referências
BALLARD, G.; HOWELL, G. Shielding Production: Essential Step in Production Control.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 124, n. 1, p. 11 17, 1998.
Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2rQZF6P>.
BALLARD, H. G. Lookahead Planning: The Missing Link in Production Control. In: 5thAnnual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Anais...1997.
Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2rO23vO>.
BALLARD, H. G. The last planner system of production control. 2000. 192f. Doctor OfPhilosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 2000. Disponível em:<http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/4789/>.
BORTOLAZZA, R. C.; FORMOSO, C. T. A quantitative analysis of data collected fromthe last planner system in Brazil. In: 14th Annual Conference of the InternationalGroup for Lean Construction, (IGLC-14), Santiago, Chile. Anais... Santiago, Chile:2006. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2rPieZZ>.
BRITT, K.; ALVES, T. D. C. L.; REED, D.; GRACZ, B. Lessons learned from the make readyprocess in a hospital project. In: 22nd Annual Conference of the International Groupfor Lean Construction, (IGLC-22), Oslo, Norway. Anais... Oslo, Norway: 2014.
Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2wMVQoI>.
COELHO, H. O. Diretrizes e requisitos para o planejamento e controle da produçãoem nível de médio prazo na construção civil. 2003. 135f. Dissertação (Mestrado emEngenharia - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil. UniversidadeFederal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2003. Disponível em:<https://bit.ly/2L72ZDA>.
DRESCH, Aline; LACERDA, Daniel Pacheco; ANTUNES JÚNIOR, José Antonio Valle.
Design science research: método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência etecnologia. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015. 181 p.
FABBRI, S.; SILVA, C.; HERNANDES, E.; OCTAVIANO, F.; DI THOMMAZO, A.; BELGAMO,A. Improvements in the StArt tool to better support the systematic review process. In:Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment inSoftware Engineering - EASE 16, New York, NY, USA. Anais... New York, NY, USA: ACMPress, 2016. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2Ir8FGB>. Acesso em: 9 out. 2017.
HAMZEH, F.; BALLARD, G.; TOMMELEIN, I. D. Rethinking Lookahead Planning toOptimize Construction Workflow. Lean Construction Journal, p. 15 34, 2012.
Disponível em: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>.
HAMZEH, F.; LANGERUD, B. Using simulation to study the impact of imrovinglookahead planning on the reliability of production planning. In: SimulationConference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter, (IEEE), Grand Arizona ResorPhoenix, AZ, USA. Anais... Grand Arizona Resor Phoenix, AZ, USA: 2011. Disponível em:.
HAMZEH, F. R. Improving construction workflow - The role of production planning andcontrol. 2009. 271f. Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2009. Disponível em:<https://bit.ly/2KuFQtJ>.
HAMZEH, F. R.; BALLARD, G.; TOMMELEIN, I. D. Improving Construction Work Flow TheConnective Role of Lookahead Planning. In: 16th Annual Conference of theInternational Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC-16), Manchester, UK. Anais...
Manchester, UK: 2008. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2GtdT2W>.
HAMZEH, F. R.; MORSHED, F. A.; JALWAN, H.; SAAB, I. Is improvisation compatible withlook ahead planning? An exploratory study. In: 20th Annual Conference of theInternational Group for Lean Construction 2011, (IGLC-20), San Diego, CA, USA.
Anais... San Diego, CA, USA: 2012. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2k4AZEg>.
HAMZEH, F. R.; SAAB, I.; TOMMELEIN, I. D.; BALLARD, G. Understanding the role ofAutomation inConstruction, v. 49, n. PA, p. 18 26, jan. 2015. Disponível em:<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.005>.
lookahead planning impact reliable workflow and project duration? ConstructionManagement and Economics, v. 33, n. 4, p. 243 258, 2015. Disponível em:<http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01446193.2015.1047878>.
HAMZEH, F.; ZANKOUL, E.; SAKKA, F. El. Removing Constraints to Make Tasks Ready inWeekly Work Planning. Procedia Engineering, v. 164, n. June, p. 68 74, 2016.
Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.593>.
HOWELL, G.; BALLARD, G.; HALL, J. Capacity utilization and wait time: a primer forconstruction. In: 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for LeanConstruction, (IGLC-9), Singapore, Korea. Anais... Singapore, Korea: 2001. Disponívelem: <https://bit.ly/2rNbtXu>.
KEMMER, S. L.; HEINECK, L. F. M.; NOVAES, M. de V.; ALVES, T. da C. L. Medium-TermPlanning: Contributions Based on Field Application. In: 13th Annual Conference ofthe International Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC-13), July, Sydney, Australia.
Anais... Sydney, Australia: 2007. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2IsGRBO>.
KHANH, H. D.; KIM, S. Y. A survey on production planning system in constructionprojects based on Last Planner System. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 20, n. 1,p. 1 11, 23 jan. 2016. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12205-015-1412-y>.
KOSKELA, L. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Center forIntegrated Facility Engineering, v. 72, p. 1 81, 1992. Disponível em:<https://goo.gl/3yNAkB>.
MOHAN, S. B.; IYER, S. Effectiveness of lean principles in construction. In: 13th AnnualConference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC-13), iv, Sydney,Australia. Anais... Sydney, Australia: 2005. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2GqlO0R>.
SALVATIERRA, J. L.; ALARCÓN, L. F.; LÓPEZ, Á.; VELÁSQUEZ, X. Lean diagnosis forchilean construction industry: Towards more sustainable Lean practices and tools. In:23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC-23),Perth, Australia. Anais... Perth, Australia: 2015. Disponível em:<https://bit.ly/2IwDRUX>.
SAMUDIO, M.; ALVES, T. da C. L. Look-Ahead Planning : Reducing Variation To WorkFlow on Projects. In: 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for LeanConstruction 2011, (IGLC-20), San Diego, CA, USA. Anais... San Diego, CA, USA: 2012.
Disponível em: <http://alves.sdsu.edu/Papers/SamudioAlves2012Look-AheadPlanningReducingVariationToWorkFlowOnProjectsLadenWithChange.pdf>.
TOLEDO, M.; OLIVARES, K.; GÓNZALEZ, V. Exploration of a Lean - Bim PlanningFramework: A Last Planner System and Bim - Based Case Study. In: 24th AnnualConference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (IGLC-24), Boston, USA.
Anais... Boston, USA: 2016. Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2rOL0Jp>. Acesso em: 5 jan.2017.
WAMBEKE, B. W.; LIU, M.; HSIANG, S. M. Using Last Planner and a Risk AssessmentMatrix to Reduce Variation in Mechanical Related Construction Tasks. Journal ofConstruction Engineering and Management, v. 138, n. 4, p. 491 498, abr. 2012.
Disponível em: <https://bit.ly/2rN0GxE>.
WESZ, J.; FORMOSO, C.; TZORTZOPOULOS, P. Design process planning and control:last planner system adaptation. In: 21st Annual Conference of the InternationalGroup for Lean Construction, (IGLC-21), July, Fortaleza, Brazil. Anais... Fortaleza, Brazil:2013. Disponível em: <http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/20969/>.
