DISPUTE BOARDS: INOVAÇÃO NO GERENCIAMENTO DE CONFLITOS EM OBRAS DE CONSTRUÇÃO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v17i1.1555Palavras-chave:
Dispute boards, Conflicts, Construction, Contractual management, InfrastructureResumo
Construction projects involve unique and complex products that depend on unclear variables and multiple agents, turning them into potential sceneries for the growth of conflicts. These disagreements, considered as inevitable and intrinsic to this productive environment, may become disputes when not solved, which may cause forfeiture of deadlines, results and expectations in a project. The increase of disputes at construction projects worldwide has stimulated the creation of methods for avoiding and settling disputes, alternatively to standard judicial proceedings. Highlights at this context are the Dispute Boards, which consist in committees that monitor the execution of big construction projects, in order to prevent and solve conflicts through recommendations and decisions. This work aims to present an overview of Dispute Boards, their modalities, characteristics, as well as the main cases in the world and the most known case in Brazil. Through the bibliographic review, s possible to notice that the adoption of Dispute Boards offers several benefits and that must be encouraged in the construction industry.
Referências
BENVENUTI, R. UTILIZAÇÃO DA ARBITRAGEM COMO FORMA DE SOLUÇÃO DE DISPUTASPOR EMPRESAS CONSTRUTORAS. São Paulo: Escola Politécnica da USP, 2010.
CHARRETT, D. Dispute Boards and Construction Contracts. Disponível em:<http://fidic.org/sites/default/files/3 charrett09_dispute_boards.pdf>. Acesso em: 29jul. 2018.
CHERN, C. Chern on Dispute Boards: Practice and Procedure. Third ed. Abingdon:Informa Law, 2015.
DRBF. DRBF Practices and Procedures Manual. Charlotte: Dispute Boards ResolutionFoundation, 2007.
GOULD, N.; LOCKWOOD, C.; KING, C. Dispute Board Rules Consultation 14 October2013. n. October, 2013.
ICC International Chamber of Commerce. Regulamento Relativo aos DisputeBoards. Paris, 2016.
JOBIM, J. P.; RICARDINO, R.; CAMARGO, R. A. A EXPERIÊNCIA BRASILEIRA EM CRD: OCASO DO METRÔ DE SÃO PAULO. In: CRD - Comitê de Resolução de Disputas nosContratos de Construção e Infraestrutura. São Paulo: PINI, 2016. p. 169 191.
KIRSH, H. J. Resolving Complex Construction Claims: The Sheppard Subway CaseStudy. p. 111 113, 2010.
NG, H.; PEÑA-MORA, F.; TAMAKI, T. Dynamic Conflict Management in Large-ScaleDesign and Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, v. 23, n. 2,p. 52 66, 2007.
RUBIN, R.; QUINTAS, B. Alternative dispute resolution in US public works: proposedmodel. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, v. 129, n.2, p. 80 83, 2003.
TRINDADE, B. R. et al. CRD - Comitê de Resolução de Disputas nos Contratos deContrução de Infraestrutura. 1ª Edição ed. São Paulo: Editora PINI, 2016.
VAQUERO, R. Financiamento para implantação da Linha 4 do Metrô sairá em marçodeste ano. Disponível em: <http://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/eventos/financiamentopara-implantacao-da-linha-4-do-metro-saira-em-marco-deste-ano/>. Acesso em: 19maio. 2018.
