Ferramenta ACV aplicada em retrofit de edificações: uma revisão sistemática

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v19i1.1996

Palavras-chave:

Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida, Retrofit, Edificações, Revisão sistemática

Resumo

O processo de retrofit de edificações pode ser uma opção sustentável para o reaproveitamento de edificações e a mitigação de impactos ambientais. O objetivo do estudo é realizar uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre o tema de ACV aplicada em retrofit, buscando analisar as contribuições e os métodos considerados. O estudo parte de 27 artigos publicados em periódicos internacionais, estruturados como estudos de caso e revisões sistemáticas. Nota-se que o retrofit de edificações oportuniza o aproveitamento de edificações existentes, a implementação de estratégias sustentáveis e, também, o desenvolvimento de mais estudos no âmbito científico nacional.

Biografia do Autor

Bárbara Pretto Biasi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduada em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal do Pampa (Alegrete - RS, Brasil). Mestranda em Engenharia Civil: Construção e Infraestrutura pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil).

Daniela Bertuol, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduada em Arquitetura e Urbanismo pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (São Leopoldo - RS, Brasil). Mestranda em Engenharia Civil: Construção e Infraestrutura pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil).

Ana Carolina Badalotti Passuello , Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Pós-Doutorado pela Universitat Rovira i Virgili ( Tarragona, Espanha) e pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Professora na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil).

Referências

ANGRISANO, M. et al. The evaluation of historic building energy retrofit projects through the life cycle assessment. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 11, n. 15, 1 ago. 2021.

ANTIPOVA, E. et al. Multi-objective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment for retrofitting buildings. Energy and Buildings, v. 82, p. 92–99, 2014.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS (ABNT). ABNT NBR NORMA BRASILEIRA ICS Número de referência Edificações habitacionais-Desempenho Parte 1: Requisitos gerais Residential buildings-Performance Part 1: General requirements. [s.l: s.n.].

ATMACA, N.; ATMACA, A.; ÖZÇETIN, A. İ. The impacts of restoration and reconstruction of a heritage building on life cycle energy consumption and related carbon dioxide emissions. Energy and Buildings, v. 253, 15 dez. 2021.

BELUCIO, M. et al. Eco-efficiency in early design decisions: A multimethodology approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 283, 10 fev. 2021.

BERG, F.; FUGLSETH, M. Life cycle assessment and historic buildings: Energy-efficiency refurbishment versus new construction in Norway. Journal of Architectural Conservation, v. 24, n. 2, p. 152–167, 4 maio 2018.

BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE B/558, S. OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS.; BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION; EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION. Sustainability of construction works : assessment of environmental performance of buildings : calculation method. EN 15978 ed. [s.l: s.n.].

CUI, W. et al. Co-benefits analysis of buildings based on different renewal strategies: The emergy-lca approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 2, p. 1–23, 2 jan. 2021.

FERREIRA, J.; DUARTE PINHEIRO, M.; DE BRITO, J. Economic and environmental savings of structural buildings refurbishment with demolition and reconstruction - A Portuguese benchmarking. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 3, p. 114–126, 25 jul. 2015.

GALIMSHINA, A. et al. Statistical method to identify robust building renovation choices for environmental and economic performance. Building and Environment, v. 183, 1 out. 2020.

HASIK, V. et al. Comparative whole-building life cycle assessment of renovation and new construction. Building and Environment, v. 161, 15 ago. 2019.

LANGSTON, C.; CHAN, E. H. W.; YUNG, E. H. K. Hybrid input-output analysis of embodied carbon and construction cost differences between new-build and refurbished projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 10, n. 9, 10 set. 2018.

MARIQUE, A. F.; ROSSI, B. Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment within the built environment: Comparison between the refurbishment and the complete reconstruction of an office building in Belgium. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 224, p. 396–405, 15 out. 2018

MILETO, C. et al. A sustainable approach for the refurbishment process of vernacular heritage: The sesga house case study (valencia, spain). Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 17, 1 set. 2021.

MJÖRNELL, K. et al. A tool to evaluate different renovation alternatives with regard to sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 6, n. 7, p. 4227–4245, 2014.

MONTEIRO, H.; FREIRE, F. Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods. Energy and Buildings, v. 47, p. 572–583, abr. 2012.

PALACIOS-MUNOZ, B. et al. Sustainability assessment of refurbishment vs. new constructions by means of LCA and durability-based estimations of buildings lifespans: A new approach. Building and Environment, v. 160, 1 ago. 2019.

PITTAU, F. et al. Environmental consequences of refurbishment vs. demolition and reconstruction: A comparative life cycle assessment of an Italian case study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Anais...Institute of Physics Publishing, 30 jul. 2019.

POMBO, O. et al. Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting - A case study of the Spanish housing stock. Energy and Buildings, v. 116, p. 384–394, 15 mar. 2016.

POMBO, O.; RIVELA, B.; NEILA, J. The challenge of sustainable building renovation: Assessment of current criteria and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier Ltd, 1 jun. 2016.

PRABATHA, T. et al. To retrofit or not? Making energy retrofit decisions through life cycle thinking for Canadian residences. Energy and Buildings, v. 226, 1 nov. 2020.

REZA, B.; SADIQ, R.; HEWAGE, K. Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) of multi-unit and single-family residential buildings in Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, v. 3, n. 2, p. 207–224, 2014.

RODRIGUES, C. et al. Streamlined environmental and cost life-cycle approach for building thermal retrofits: A case of residential buildings in South European climates. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 172, p. 2625–2635, 20 jan. 2018.

RODRIGUES, C.; FREIRE, F. Integrated life-cycle assessment and thermal dynamic simulation of alternative scenarios for the roof retrofit of a house. Building and Environment, v. 81, p. 204–215, 2014.

STRUHALA, K.; OSTRÝ, M. Life-cycle assessment of a rural terraced house: A struggle with sustainability of building renovations. Energies, v. 14, n. 9, 1 maio 2021.

VILCHES, A.; GARCIA-MARTINEZ, A.; SANCHEZ-MONTAÑES, B. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings Elsevier Ltd, 15 jan. 2017.

WEILER, V.; HARTER, H.; EICKER, U. Life cycle assessment of buildings and city quarters comparing demolition and reconstruction with refurbishment. Energy and Buildings, v. 134, p. 319–328, 1 jan. 2017.

ZABALZA, I. et al. Use of LCA as a tool for building ecodesign. A case study of a low energy building in Spain. Energies, v. 6, n. 8, p. 3901–3921, 2013.

ZIMMERMANN, R. K. et al. LCA-Framework to evaluate circular economy strategies in existing buildings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Anais...IOP Publishing Ltd, 20 nov. 2020.

Downloads

Publicado

07/11/2022

Como Citar

PRETTO BIASI, B.; BERTUOL, D.; BADALOTTI PASSUELLO , A. C. Ferramenta ACV aplicada em retrofit de edificações: uma revisão sistemática . In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA DO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, 19., 2022. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2022. p. 1–15. DOI: 10.46421/entac.v19i1.1996. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/entac/article/view/1996. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Gestão e Economia da Construção