Otimização do canteiro de obras através de Planejamento Sistemático de Layout, algoritmo genético e BIM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v20i1.6248Palavras-chave:
Otimização, PSL, Algoritmo genético, Minimização de distâncias, Regras baseadas no conhecimentoResumo
Estudos anteriores propuseram abordagens de otimização para gerar o layout do canteiro de obras, como modelos matemáticos e algoritmos computacionais. Porém, estas são pouco adotadas na prática devido às limitações técnicas, custos excessivos e a falta de flexibilidade em tais soluções automatizadas. Esta pesquisa assume que envolver tomadores de decisão no em uma abordagem de otimização garante soluções mais assertivas no planejamento. O Planejamento Sistemático de Layout (PSL) é utilizado para planejar o arranjo de instalações na indústria manufatureira, aplicando regras para avaliar a necessidade de proximidade entre as instalações. Já a Modelagem da Informação da Construção (BIM), fornece uma estrutura adequada para apoiar o processo de tomada de decisão. Através da Design Science Research, esta pesquisa visa desenvolver uma ferramenta para apoio à tomada de decisão no planejamento e logística de canteiro de obras, integrando BIM, PSL e um algoritmo genético. A sua principal contribuição é a proposição de uma abordagem eficiente e precisa para o planejamento do canteiro, promovendo a otimização dos recursos disponíveis e melhorando a qualidade e produtividade no processo construtivo.
Referências
ANDAYESH, M.; SADEGHPOUR, F. Dynamic site layout planning through minimization of total potential energy. Automation in Construction, v. 31, p. 92–102, 2013a.
CHAU, K. W.; ANSON, M. A Knowledge-Based System for Construction Site Level Facilities Layout The Construction Site Layout Problem. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, v. 2358, p. 393–402, 2002.
SJØBAKK, B.; SKJELSTAD, L. Proposing a standard template for construction site layout: A case study of a Norwegian contractor. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, v. 459, p. 376–382, 2015.
SAID, H.; EL-RAYES, K. Optimizing Material Procurement and Storage on Construction Sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 137, n. 6, p. 421–431, 2011.
SCHWABE, K.; TEIZER, J.; KÖNIG, M. Applying rule-based model-checking to construction site layout planning tasks. Automation in Construction, v. 97, n. November 2017, p. 205–219, 2019.
SAID, H.; EL-RAYES, K. Automated multi-objective construction logistics optimization system. Automation in Construction, v. 43, p. 110–122, 2014.
AKANMU, A. et al. Auto-generated site layout: An integrated approach to real-time sensing of temporary facilities in infrastructure projects. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, v. 12, n. 10, p. 1243–1255, 2016.
FLESSAS, M. et al. Layout performance indicators and systematic planning: A case study in a Southern Brazilian restaurant. British Food Journal, v. 117, n. 8, p. 2098–2111, 2015.
LE, P. L.; DAO, T. M.; CHAABANE, A. BIM-based framework for temporary facility layout planning in construction site: A hybrid approach. Construction Innovation, v. 19, n. 3, p. 424–464, 2019.
AMIRI, R.; SARDROUD, J. M.; SOTO, B. G. DE. BIM-based Applications of Metaheuristic Algorithms to Support the Decision-making Process: Uses in the Planning of Construction Site Layout. Procedia Engineering, v. 196, n. June, p. 558–564, 2017.
VARGAS, F. B. DE; FORMOSO, C. T. Método para planejamento e controle da produção baseado em zonas de trabalho com o apoio de BIM. Ambiente Construído, v. 20, n. 1, p. 129–151, 2020.
MOON, H. et al. Development of a schedule-workspace interference management system simultaneously considering the overlap level of parallel schedules and workspaces. Automation in Construction, v. 39, p. 93–105, 2014.
KASSEM, M.; DAWOOD, N.; CHAVADA, R. Construction workspace management within an Industry Foundation Class-Compliant 4D tool. Automation in Construction, v. 52, n. September, p. 42–58, 2015.
SU, X.; CAI, H. Life Cycle Approach to Construction Workspace Modeling and Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 140, n. 7, p. 1–12, 2014.
GUO, S.-J. Identification and Resolution of Work Space Conflicts in Building Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 128, n. 4, p. 287–295, 2002.
ZHANG, J. P.; HU, Z. Z. Automation in Construction BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and management for con fl icts and structural safety problems during construction : 1 . Principles and methodologies. Aut, v. 20, n. 2, p. 155–166, 2011.
SONG, X. et al. Conflict resolution-motivated strategy towards integrated construction site layout and material logistics planning: A bi-stakeholder perspective. Automation in Construction, v. 87, n. July 2017, p. 138–157, 2018.
NING, X. .; LIU, W. A Safety Model for Construction Site Layout Planning Using an ACO Algorithm. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, n., 2015, Lulea, Suécia. Anais […] Lulea: 2015, p. 28-32.
PIKAS, E. et al. Overview of Building Information Modelling in Healthcare Projects. HaCIRIC 11 Conference Proceedings, HaCIRIC, Imperial College, Tanaka Business School, Manchester, UK, 26-28 September 2011, p. 286–298, 2011.
ZOUEIN, P. P.; HARMANANI, H.; HAJAR, A. Genetic Algorithm for Solving Site Layout Problem with Unequal-Size and Constrained Facilities. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, v. 16, n. 2, p. 143–151, 2002.
YAHYA, M.; SAKA, M. P. Construction site layout planning using multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm with Levy flights. Automation in Construction, v. 38, p. 14–29, 2014.
HAMMAD, A. A multi-objective construction site layout planning problem solved through integration of location and traffic assignment models. Construction Management and Economics, v. 38, n. 8, p. 756–772, 2020.
ZOUEIN, P. P.; TOMMELEIN, I. D. Dynamic Layout Planning Using a Hybrid Incremental Solution Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 125, n. 6, p. 400–408, 1999.
XU, J.; LI, Z. Multi-objective dynamic construction site layout planning in fuzzy random environment. Automation in Construction, v. 27, p. 155–169, 2012.
ELBELTAGI, E. et al. Schedule-dependent evolution of site layout planning. Construction Management and Economics, v. 19, n. 7, p. 689–697, 2001.
LIANG, C. J.; KAMAT, V. R.; MENASSA, C. M. Real-time construction site layout and equipment monitoring. Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Information Technology - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018, v. 2018- April, p. 64–74, 2018.
HAMMAD, A.; AKBARNEZHAD, A.; REY, D. A multi-objective mixed integer nonlinear programming model for construction site layout planning to minimise noise pollution and transport costs. Automation in Construction, v. 61, p. 73–85, 2016.
AL HAWARNEH, A.; BENDAK, S.; GHANIM, F. Dynamic facilities planning model for large scale construction projects. Automation in Construction, v. 98, n. September 2017, p. 72–89, 2019.
KUMAR, S. S.; CHENG, J. C. P. A BIM-based automated site layout planning framework for congested construction sites. Automation in Construction, v. 59, p. 24–37, 2015.
LIU, K. H. et al. Planejamento Sistemático do Layout in human-system interface: An evaluation of alarm displays with spatial proximity for accidents diagnosis of advanced boiling water reactor. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 51, p. 30–42, 2016.
SINGH, A. P.; YILMA, M. Production floor layout using Planejamento Sistemático do Layout in Can manufacturing company. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 13., 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia. Anais […] Hammamet: University of Monastir...2013, p. 822-828.
MARCH, S. T.; SMITH, G. F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, v. 15, n. 4, p. 251–266, dez. 1995.
LACERDA, D. P.; DRESCH, A.; PROENÇA, A.; ANTUNES JÚNIOR, J. A. V.. Design Science Research: método de pesquisa para a engenharia de produção. Gestão & Produção, [S.L.], v. 20, n. 4, p. 741-761, 26 nov. 2013.
