Entornos biofílicos en realidad virtual: una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre indicadores fisiológicos y psicológicos.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/encacelacac.v18i1.7225Palabras clave:
Biofilia, Realidad virtual, Bienestar, Indicadores fisiológicosResumen
El contacto visual con elementos naturales impacta positivamente la salud mental y el bienestar. Sin embargo, el crecimiento urbano ha reducido las áreas verdes, aumentando la desconexión con la naturaleza. Este estudio revisa los efectos de la exposición a entornos biofílicos en realidad virtual (RV) sobre indicadores fisiológicos y psicológicos. Los resultados mostraron que la inmersión en RV biofílica redujo la presión arterial, la frecuencia cardíaca y el cortisol, además de aumentar la variabilidad de la frecuencia cardíaca y la relajación. La biofilia en RV es una herramienta clave para la restauración de la salud, especialmente donde la naturaleza es limitada.Citas
BAKTASH, H.; KIM, D.; SHIRAZI, A. Beyond sight: Comparing traditional virtual reality and immersive multi-sensory environments in stress reduction of university students. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, v. 5, 2024.
CHAN, S. H. M. et al. Vertical greenery buffers against stress: Evidence from psychophysiological responses in virtual reality. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 213, 1 set. 2021.
CHAN, S. H. M.; QIU, L.; XIE, T. Understanding experiences in metaverse: How virtual nature impacts affect, pro-environmental attitudes, and intention to engage with physical nature. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 149, 1 dez. 2023.
CHEN, D. et al. Physiological and psychological responses to transitions between urban built and natural environments using the cave automated virtual environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 241, 1 jan. 2024.
DU, Hongyu; ZHOU, Fengqi; CAI, Yongli; LI, Chunlan; XU, Yanqing. Research on public health and well-being associated to the vegetation configuration of urbangreen space, a case study of Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v.59, 2021.
EMAMJOMEH, A.; ZHU, Y.; BECK, M. The potential of applying immersive virtual environment to biophilic building design: A pilot study. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 32, 1 nov. 2020.
FIRTH, A.; JAYADAS, A. Biophilic Design of the ISS Crew Quarters to Improve Cognitive and Physiological Health Measures. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. Anais...IEEE Computer Society, 2022.
HUANG, Q. et al. Trees, grass, or concrete? The effects of different types of environments on stress reduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 193, 1 jan. 2020.
JUNG, D.; KIM, D. I.; KIM, N. Bringing nature into hospital architecture: Machine learning-based EEG analysis of the biophilia effect in virtual reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 89, 1 ago. 2023.
JABBAR, M.; YUSOFF, M.; SHAFIE, A. Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: A systematic review. GeoJournal, 2021, pp. 1-19.
KUMPULAINEN, S.; ESMAEILZADEH, S.; PESOLA, A. J. Assessing the well-being benefits of VR nature experiences on group: Heart rate variability insights from a cross-over study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 97, 1 ago. 2024.
MASTERS, R. et al. Virtual Nature: Investigating The Effect of Biomass on Immersive Virtual Reality Forest Bathing Applications For Stress Reduction. Proceedings - SAP 2022: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. Anais...Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 22 set. 2022.
MENG, L.; LI, S.; ZHANG, X. Assessing biodiversity’s impact on stress and affect from urban to conservation areas: A virtual reality study. Ecological Indicators, v. 158, 1 jan. 2024.
SPIELBERGER, Charles Donald et al. Manual para o inventário de ansiedade de características estaduais. Imprensa de Consultoria de Psicólogos. 1983.
SUN, Y. et al. Physiological and affective responses to green space virtual reality among pregnant women. Environmental Research, v. 216, 1 jan. 2023.
ULRICH, R. S. Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes. In: KELLERT, S.R.; WILSON, E. O. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Whashington: Island Press, 1993.
ULRICH, R. S. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 13, p. 29-44, 1986.
XU, W. et al. Exploring the impact of university green spaces on Students’ perceived restoration and emotional states through audio-visual perception. Ecological Informatics, v. 82, 1 set. 2024.
WATSON, David; CLARK, Lee Anna; TELLEGEN, Auke. Desenvolvimento e validação de medidas breves de afeto positivo e negativo: As escalas PANAS. Jornal de Personalidade e Psicologia Social, v. 54(6), p. 1063–1070, 1988.
WILSON, Edward O. Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1984.
WILSON, E. O. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
YEOM, S.; KIM, H.; HONG, T. Psychological and physiological effects of a green wall on occupants: A cross-over study in virtual reality. Building and Environment, v. 204, 15 out. 2021.
YIN, J. et al. Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, v. 136, 1 mar. 2020.
YIN, J. et al. Effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality. Indoor Air, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1028–1039, 1 nov. 2019.
YIN, J. et al. Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Building and Environment, v. 132, p. 255–262, 15 mar. 2018.
YOU, J. et al. Biophilic classroom environments on stress and cognitive performance: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality (VR). PLoS ONE, v. 18, n. 11 November, 1 nov. 2023.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CONFORTO NO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
