Carbon footprint in brazilian civil construction:
A comparison with the world's leading economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.7590Keywords:
Carbon Footprint, CO2 Emissions, Multiregional Input-Output Model (MRIO), Construction, BrazilAbstract
This study investigates the carbon footprint associated with civil construction works in Brazil, using the EXIOBASE database and the OpenLCA software with the CML 2001 – baseline method. The analysis is conducted through a multiregional input-output (MRIO) model, focusing on the product "civil construction works" and includes a comparison with the five largest global economies in terms of Gross Domestic Product (China, the United States, Germany, Japan, and India). The results indicate that Brazil’s carbon footprint is 0.97 kgCO2e/EUR, lower than that of China and India, but higher than that of the other countries analyzed. Cement and lime production stands out as the main emission source, followed by direct emissions from construction activities and the use of inputs such as iron and steel. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed that, although there are no statistically significant differences between countries, the variation among emission sources is statistically significant. This study contributes to the understanding of the climate impacts of the construction sector in Brazil and supports the development of strategies aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals.
References
ASHRAE. Documento de Posição da ASHRAE sobre Descarbonização de Edifícios. [S.l.: S.n.]. Disponível em: .
BARAN, Edyta et al. Quantifying Environmental Burdens of Plasters Based on Natural vs. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Gypsum. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 8, p. 4298, 13 abr. 2021.
BRASIL. Projeto do MCTI quer descarbonizar construção civil por meio de edifícios com zero emissão de CO2. Disponível em: <https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/noticias/2023/12/projeto-do-mcti-quer-descarbonizar-construcao-civil-por-meio-de-edificios-com-zero-emissao-de-co2>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira et al. Deploying of the carbon capture technologies for CO2 emission mitigation in the industrial sectors. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, v. 7, p. 100102, jun. 2023.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira; DE SOUZA, Jhonathan Fernandes Torres. Cluster and regression analyses to model global emissions. International Journal of Global Warming, v. 34, n. 4, p. 300–313, 2024.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira; PACCA, Sérgio Almeida. Carbon footprint of Brazilian families based on the Household Budget Survey and input-output analysis. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 26, 2023.
CBIC. PIB Brasil e Construção Civil. Disponível em: <http://www.cbicdados.com.br/menu/pib-e-investimento/pib-brasil-e-construcao-civil>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
CECARBON. Metodologia. Disponível em: <https://cecarbon.com.br/methodology>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS, João Paulo; GIOVANETTI EL-DEIR, Soraya. PRODUÇÃO DE GESSO NO ARARIPE PERNAMBUCANO: IMPACTOS AMBIENTAIS E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURAS. Revista AIDIS de Ingeniería y Ciencias Ambientales. Investigación, desarrollo y práctica, v. 12, n. 3, p. 496, 6 dez. 2019.
DE SOUZA, Jhonathan Fernandes Torres; PACCA, Sérgio A. Carbon reduction potential and costs through circular bioeconomy in the Brazilian steel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 169, p. 105517, jun. 2021.
GIACOMIN, Alessandra Maria; PACCA, Sergio Almeida. Input–output analysis as guidance for the Brazilian textile supply chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 30 jan. 2024.
GREEN DELTA. About openLCA. Disponível em: <https://www.openlca.org/about/>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025a.
GREEN DELTA. openLCA Nexus: Exiobase. Disponível em: <https://nexus.openlca.org/database/exiobase>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025b.
HARPPRECHT, Carina et al. Decarbonization scenarios for the iron and steel industry in context of a sectoral carbon budget: Germany as a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 380, 20 dez. 2022.
HUBACEK, Klaus et al. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment, v. 2, n. 6, p. 361–369, 25 dez. 2017.
IMADA, Seiya; MAENO, Keitaro; KAGAWA, Shigemi. CO2 emission hotspots analysis on supply chains for wooden houses in Japan. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 353, 27 fev. 2024.
IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Paola Arias et al., Orgs.). [S.l.: S.n.]. Disponível em: <https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/>.
JONES, Christopher M.; KAMMEN, Daniel M. Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S. Households and Communities. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 45, n. 9, p. 4088–4095, 1 maio 2011.
KIHARA, Yushiro; ABCP; SNIC. Brazil: a view on the future. Disponível em: <https://coprocessamento.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/CementReview.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2025.
LEED. Como o LEED v4.1 trata o carbono incorporado. Disponível em: <https://www.gbcbrasil.org.br/como-o-leed-v4-1-trata-o-carbono-incorporado/>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
ONAT, Nuri Cihat; KUCUKVAR, Murat. Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 124, 1 maio 2020.
OTTELIN, Juudit et al. Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland. Environmental Research Letters, v. 16, n. 7, p. 074006, 1 jul. 2021.
RANGANATH, Sindhuja; MCCORD, Stephen; SICK, Volker. Assessing the maturity of alternative construction materials and their potential impact on embodied carbon for single-family homes in the American Midwest. Frontiers in Built Environment, v. 10, 19 abr. 2024.
SIDAC. Conteúdo técnico. Disponível em: <https://sidac.org.br/conteudo_tecnico>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
SIMAPRO. SimaPro Database Manual - Methods. Disponível em: <https://simapro.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/DatabaseManualMethods.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
SMALL WORLD CONSULTING LTD. Multi-regional Input Output (MRIO) Emissions Factors v1.0 Comparison & Validation. Lancaster: [S.n.].
STADLER, Konstantin et al. EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi‐Regional Input‐Output Tables. Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 22, n. 3, p. 502–515, 13 jun. 2018.
STADLER, Konstantin et al. EXIOBASE 3 (3.8.2) [Data set]. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5589597>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
STEEN‐OLSEN, Kjartan; WOOD, Richard; HERTWICH, Edgar G. The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Household Consumption 1999–2012. Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 20, n. 3, p. 582–592, 14 jun. 2016.
TIKADAR, Biswajit; SWAMI, Deepika; CHOWDHARY, Vaibhav. Process-level emission analysis and decarbonization pathway for BF-BOF route in Indian iron and steel industry. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 373, 1 jan. 2025.
YAN, Bingqian; DIETZENBACHER, Erik; LOS, Bart. The global emission mitigation potential of avoiding waste and product lifespan extension by Chinese households. Heliyon, v. 10, n. 3, 15 fev. 2024.
ZEN, Irina Safitri et al. Magnitudes of households’ carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: Policy implications for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 315, p. 128042, set. 2021.
ZHAO, Caiyu et al. Enhancing energy storage capability for renewable energy systems through advanced cement-based supercapacitors. Energy and Buildings, p. 115732, abr. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Latin American and European Meeting on Sustainable Buildings and Communities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
