Huella de carbono en la construcción civil brasileña:
Una comparación con las principales economías globales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.7590Palabras clave:
Huella de carbono, Emisiones de CO2, Modelo Multirregional Entrada-Salida (MRIO), Construcción Civil, BrasilResumen
El presente estudio investiga la huella de carbono asociada a las obras de construcción civil en Brasil, utilizando la base de datos EXIOBASE y el software OpenLCA con el método de cálculo CML 2001 – baseline. El análisis se realiza mediante un modelo insumo-producto multirregional (MRIO), con enfoque en el producto “obras de construcción civil”, e incluye una comparación con las cinco mayores economías del mundo en términos de Producto Interno Bruto (China, Estados Unidos, Alemania, Japón e India). Los resultados indican que la huella de carbono brasileña es de 0,97 kgCO₂e/EUR, inferior a la de China e India, pero superior a la de los demás países analizados. La producción de cemento y cal destaca como el principal proceso emisor, seguida por las emisiones directas de las actividades de construcción y el uso de insumos como hierro y acero. El análisis estadístico (ANOVA) reveló que, aunque no existen diferencias significativas entre los países, los procesos emisores varían de forma estadísticamente significativa. Este trabajo contribuye a la comprensión de los impactos climáticos del sector de la construcción civil en Brasil y apoya el desarrollo de estrategias alineadas con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible.
Citas
ASHRAE. Documento de Posição da ASHRAE sobre Descarbonização de Edifícios. [S.l.: S.n.]. Disponível em: .
BARAN, Edyta et al. Quantifying Environmental Burdens of Plasters Based on Natural vs. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Gypsum. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 8, p. 4298, 13 abr. 2021.
BRASIL. Projeto do MCTI quer descarbonizar construção civil por meio de edifícios com zero emissão de CO2. Disponível em: <https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/noticias/2023/12/projeto-do-mcti-quer-descarbonizar-construcao-civil-por-meio-de-edificios-com-zero-emissao-de-co2>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira et al. Deploying of the carbon capture technologies for CO2 emission mitigation in the industrial sectors. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, v. 7, p. 100102, jun. 2023.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira; DE SOUZA, Jhonathan Fernandes Torres. Cluster and regression analyses to model global emissions. International Journal of Global Warming, v. 34, n. 4, p. 300–313, 2024.
CACHOLA, Celso da Silveira; PACCA, Sérgio Almeida. Carbon footprint of Brazilian families based on the Household Budget Survey and input-output analysis. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 26, 2023.
CBIC. PIB Brasil e Construção Civil. Disponível em: <http://www.cbicdados.com.br/menu/pib-e-investimento/pib-brasil-e-construcao-civil>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
CECARBON. Metodologia. Disponível em: <https://cecarbon.com.br/methodology>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS, João Paulo; GIOVANETTI EL-DEIR, Soraya. PRODUÇÃO DE GESSO NO ARARIPE PERNAMBUCANO: IMPACTOS AMBIENTAIS E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURAS. Revista AIDIS de Ingeniería y Ciencias Ambientales. Investigación, desarrollo y práctica, v. 12, n. 3, p. 496, 6 dez. 2019.
DE SOUZA, Jhonathan Fernandes Torres; PACCA, Sérgio A. Carbon reduction potential and costs through circular bioeconomy in the Brazilian steel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 169, p. 105517, jun. 2021.
GIACOMIN, Alessandra Maria; PACCA, Sergio Almeida. Input–output analysis as guidance for the Brazilian textile supply chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 30 jan. 2024.
GREEN DELTA. About openLCA. Disponível em: <https://www.openlca.org/about/>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025a.
GREEN DELTA. openLCA Nexus: Exiobase. Disponível em: <https://nexus.openlca.org/database/exiobase>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025b.
HARPPRECHT, Carina et al. Decarbonization scenarios for the iron and steel industry in context of a sectoral carbon budget: Germany as a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 380, 20 dez. 2022.
HUBACEK, Klaus et al. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment, v. 2, n. 6, p. 361–369, 25 dez. 2017.
IMADA, Seiya; MAENO, Keitaro; KAGAWA, Shigemi. CO2 emission hotspots analysis on supply chains for wooden houses in Japan. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 353, 27 fev. 2024.
IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Paola Arias et al., Orgs.). [S.l.: S.n.]. Disponível em: <https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/>.
JONES, Christopher M.; KAMMEN, Daniel M. Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S. Households and Communities. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 45, n. 9, p. 4088–4095, 1 maio 2011.
KIHARA, Yushiro; ABCP; SNIC. Brazil: a view on the future. Disponível em: <https://coprocessamento.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/CementReview.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2025.
LEED. Como o LEED v4.1 trata o carbono incorporado. Disponível em: <https://www.gbcbrasil.org.br/como-o-leed-v4-1-trata-o-carbono-incorporado/>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
ONAT, Nuri Cihat; KUCUKVAR, Murat. Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 124, 1 maio 2020.
OTTELIN, Juudit et al. Comparative carbon footprint analysis of residents of wooden and non-wooden houses in Finland. Environmental Research Letters, v. 16, n. 7, p. 074006, 1 jul. 2021.
RANGANATH, Sindhuja; MCCORD, Stephen; SICK, Volker. Assessing the maturity of alternative construction materials and their potential impact on embodied carbon for single-family homes in the American Midwest. Frontiers in Built Environment, v. 10, 19 abr. 2024.
SIDAC. Conteúdo técnico. Disponível em: <https://sidac.org.br/conteudo_tecnico>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
SIMAPRO. SimaPro Database Manual - Methods. Disponível em: <https://simapro.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/DatabaseManualMethods.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
SMALL WORLD CONSULTING LTD. Multi-regional Input Output (MRIO) Emissions Factors v1.0 Comparison & Validation. Lancaster: [S.n.].
STADLER, Konstantin et al. EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi‐Regional Input‐Output Tables. Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 22, n. 3, p. 502–515, 13 jun. 2018.
STADLER, Konstantin et al. EXIOBASE 3 (3.8.2) [Data set]. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5589597>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.
STEEN‐OLSEN, Kjartan; WOOD, Richard; HERTWICH, Edgar G. The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Household Consumption 1999–2012. Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 20, n. 3, p. 582–592, 14 jun. 2016.
TIKADAR, Biswajit; SWAMI, Deepika; CHOWDHARY, Vaibhav. Process-level emission analysis and decarbonization pathway for BF-BOF route in Indian iron and steel industry. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 373, 1 jan. 2025.
YAN, Bingqian; DIETZENBACHER, Erik; LOS, Bart. The global emission mitigation potential of avoiding waste and product lifespan extension by Chinese households. Heliyon, v. 10, n. 3, 15 fev. 2024.
ZEN, Irina Safitri et al. Magnitudes of households’ carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: Policy implications for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 315, p. 128042, set. 2021.
ZHAO, Caiyu et al. Enhancing energy storage capability for renewable energy systems through advanced cement-based supercapacitors. Energy and Buildings, p. 115732, abr. 2025.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 ENCUENTRO LATINOAMERICANO Y EUROPEO SOBRE EDIFICICACIONES Y COMUNIDADES SOSTENIBLES

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.