The Impact of active mobility on human health

A life cycle assessment of urban transportation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.7677

Keywords:

Sustainable Mobility, Urban Mobility, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Atmospheric Concentration

Abstract

Sustainable mobility, through electric mobility and active mobility, emerges as an alternative to promote transport with lower or even zero emissions of some pollutants into the atmosphere. However, based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), there are still gaps regarding the atmospheric concentrations generated by the useful life of electric vehicles, specifically in the production and disposal stages of the batteries used by these vehicles. While active mobility, a concept little studied as an aggregator and a challenge to urban mobility, in addition to its environmental impact is still unclear. The objective of the article is to evaluate and analyze the impact on human health from motorized and electric transport in comparison to active mobility. Four model scenarios are proposed that use data from LCA studies with metrics on atmospheric concentrations in NOx-eq, PM2.5-eq and SO2-eq in reference to urban mobility. As a result, an inventory of emissions from each type of urban transport in a 1km per day route, where, of the scenarios evaluated, the introduction of active mobility reduced the metrics of atmospheric concentrations by up to 40%. The study shows active mobility as the most effective key strategy for reducing impacts on human health.

Author Biographies

Maria Cynthia de Araújo Urbano, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

PhD student in the Postgraduate Program in Architecture - PROARQ - linked to the Department of Architecture at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ.

 

Lucas Rosse Caldas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

PhD in Civil Engineering, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE/UFRJ). Professor at the Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism (FAU UFRJ), Professor at the Graduate Program in Architecture (PROARQ/FAU) and at the Civil Engineering Program (PEC/COPPE/UFRJ).

References

AYDIN, N.; SEKER, S.; ÖZKAN, B. Planning location of mobility hub for sustainable urban mobility. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 81, p. 103843, 2022.

ECOINVENT. Ecoinvent Data Base Version 3.8. Data Cut: Ecoinvent 3.8, 2021. Disponível em: https://ecoinvent.org/ecoinvent.org Acesso: 12 ago. 2024

IEA - Internacional Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook. Paris, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2025.

IPCC WORKING GROUP III. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change: working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, 2014.

TOLEDO, A. L. L.; LA ROVERE, E. L. Urban Mobility and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Status, Public Policies, and Scenarios in a Developing Economy City, Natal, Brazil. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 11, p. 3995, 2018.

XU, L.; TAYLOR, J. E.; TIEN, I. Assessing the impacts of air quality alerts on micromobility transportation usage behaviors. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 84, p. 104025, 2022.

WHO - WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Inheriting a sustainable world? Atlas on children’s health and the environment. World Health Organization, 2017.

Published

30-09-2025

How to Cite

Urbano, M. C. de A., & Caldas, L. R. (2025). The Impact of active mobility on human health: A life cycle assessment of urban transportation. Latin American and European Meeting on Sustainable Buildings and Communities, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.7677