Circularity strategies in the cement industry

Challenges and opportunities for co-processing in Rio Grande do Sul

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.8082

Keywords:

Circular economy, Co-processing, Waste Utilization, Cement Industry

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the highest generators of environmental impacts, and it faces significant challenges in achieving higher levels of sustainability in its processes. Among the most polluting processes in the construction industry, cement production stands out, due to the characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how the impacts of the cement industry can be minimized by strategies, such as circularity and understanding regional production characteristics. This study aims to explore the perspectives on waste availability in Rio Grande do Sul, considering its generation trends, which can be utilized as a partial replacement for clinker and as an alternative fuel by the cement industry. To this end, data on waste generation by industries in Rio Grande do Sul between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed comparatively and critically. The analysis carried out revealed that there are wastes with characteristics and availability patterns that align with the needs of cement production, such as lime sludge and textile waste. These residues have potential for co-processing, aligning with the sustainability strategies of other industries, and offering opportunities for circularity in cement production.

Author Biographies

Ruane Fernandes de Magalhães, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

PhD in Engineering from the Graduate Program in Production Engineering (PPGEP) at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Assistant Professor A in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

Daniela Govoni Sotelo, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

PhD in Engineering and Materials Technology, working with the Nanostructures Group (NanoPUC) at the Research and Development Center in Physics and the Interdisciplinary Group of Applied Geophysics (GIGA).

Matheus Henrique Gomes de Medeiros, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

PhD candidate in the Civil Engineering Program: Construction and Infrastructure (PPGCI) at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS).

João Pedro Martins Bueno, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Undergraduate student in Economics at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

Ana Paula Kirchheim, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

PhD in Civil Engineering from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, with a doctoral internship abroad at the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering – University of California, Berkeley. Associate Professor IV in the Department of Civil Engineering and permanent faculty member of the Graduate Program in Civil Engineering: Construction and Infrastructure (PPGCI-NORIE) at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

References

ABCP – ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE CIMENTO PORTLAND. Panorama do Coprocessamento 2024 (Ano Base 2023). São Paulo, 2024.

ANCAPI, F. B.; KLEIJWEG, M.; VAN DEN BERGHE, K.; YORKE-SMITH, N.; VAN BUEREN, E. How Ex Ante Policy Evaluation Supports Circular City Development: Amsterdam’s Mass Timber Construction Policy. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 376, p. 124516, 2025.

CAMARGO-BERTEL, A. A.; HINCAPIE, D.; PUGLIESE, V.; GONZALEZ-QUIROGA, A.; PUPO-RONCALLO, O. Decarbonizing the cement industry in Latin America and the Caribbean: A comprehensive review of strategies, barriers, and policies. Energy conservation and Management: X, v. 26, p. 100956, 2025.

CHENG, Z.; LI, X.; WANG, M. Resource curse and green economic growth. Resources Policy, v. 74, p. 102325, 2021.

CONAMA – CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Resolução CONAMA/MMA nº 499, de 6 de outubro de 2020. Disponível em:< https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-conama/mma-n-499-de-6-de-outubro-de-2020-281790575>.

CORTÉS, D.; ALBERT, A. T.; DOROTHEA, G. Sustainability Reporting in the Construction Industry – Status Quo and Directions of Future Research. Heliyon, v. 9, n. 11, 2023.

DE FELICE, F., FAREED, A. G.; ZAHID, A.; NENNI, M. E.; PETRILLO, A. Circular Economy Practices in the Textile Industry for Sustainable Future: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 486, p. 144547, 2025.

DONG, B.; CHEN, C.; FANG. G.; WU, K.; WANG, Y. Positive roles of lime mud in blended Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, v. 328, p. 127067, 2022.

DZIEDZIC, R.; PONDICHERRY, P.; DZIEDZIC, P. 2025. Review of National Policy Instruments Motivating Circular Construction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 215, p. 108053, 2025.

EPE-EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Balanço Energético Nacional: Relatório Final, 2024.

FINAMORE, M.; OLTEAN-DUMBRAVA, C. Circular economy in construction - findings from a literature review. Heliyon, v. 10, e346347, 2024.

IBAMA - Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. Geração de Resíduos no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul em empreendimentos com licenciamento federal. [Dados de acesso restrito a pesquisadores com autorização], 2024.

KOSAJAN, V.; DONG, J.; WEN, Z. Investigating the Impact of Co-Processing Municipal Solid Waste in Cement Kilns on Coal Savings and Emissions Using Machine Learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 493, p. 144966, 2025.

KUMAR, P.; NANDI, B. K. Assessment of Combustion Characteristics of High Ash Indian Coal, Petroleum Coke and Their Blends for Cement Industry Using TGA. Cleaner Chemical Engineering, v. 5, p. 100091, 2023.

MALACARNE, C. S.; DA SILVA, M. R. C.; DANIELI, S.; MACIEL, V. G.; KIRCHHEIM, A. P. Environmental and Technical Assessment to Support Sustainable Strategies for Limestone Calcined Clay Cement Production in Brazil. Construction and Building Materials, v. 310, p. 125261, 2021.

MINISTÉRIO DE MINAS E ENERGIA. Comitê de Monitoramento do Setor Elétrico, 2021.

MONTEIRO, A. G. A.; SCUR, G.; MATTOS, C. A.; DE OLIVEIRA, M. C. Circular Economy in the Brazilian Chemical Industry: A Proposal for a Circularity Index. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, v. 19, p. 100730, 2024.

NETO, J. S. A.; CARVALHO, I. C.; MONTEIRO, P. J.M.; DE MATOS, P. R.; KIRCHHEIM, A. P. Unveiling the Key Factors for Clinker Reactivity and Cement Performance: A Physic-Chemical and Performance Investigation of 40 Industrial Clinkers. Cement and Concrete Research, v. 187, p. 107717, 2025.

PITRE, V.; LA, H.; BERGERSON, J. Impacts of alternative fuel combustion in cement manufacturing: Life cycle greenhouse gas, biogenic carbon, and criteria air contaminant emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 475, p. 143717, 2024.

SAKTHIVELMURUGAN, E.; SENTHILKUMAR, G.; KARTHICK, K. N. Analysis of the Impact of Circular Economy over Linear Economy in the Paper Processing Industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, v. 66, p. 1446-1452, 2022.

SALARIPOOR, H.; YOUSEFI, H.; ABDOOS, M. Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) as an Alternative to Fossil Fuels in Cement Production: A Sustainable Approach for Mitigating Carbon Emissions. Fuel Communications, v. 22, p. 100135, 2025.

SALAS, D. A., RAMIREZ, A.D.; RODRÍGUEZ, C.R.; PETROCHE, D.M.; BOERO, A.J.; DUQUE-RIVERA, J. Environmental Impacts, Life Cycle Assessment and Potential Improvement Measures for Cement Production: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 113, p. 114-122, 2016.

SCHNEIDER, M.; ROMER, M.; TSCHUDIN, M.; BOLIO, H. Sustainable Cement Production-Present and Future. Cement and Concrete Research, v. 41, p. 642-650, 2011.

SINA, A.T.; BRAHIM, J.A.; ALI, B.B.; ACHIOU, B.; HANEKLAUS, N.; BENIAZZA, R. Securing gypsum demand in cement industry by gypsum by-products: Current challenges and prospects. Materials Today Sustainability, v. 28, p. 101034, 2024.

SCRIVENER, K. L.; JOHN, V. M.; GARTNER, E. M. Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry. Cement and Concrete Research, v. 114, p. 2–26, 2018.

SILVEIRA, V. A. L.; DE RESENDE, D. S.; BEZERRA, A. C. S. Sanitary Ware Waste in Eco-Friendly Portland Blended Cement: Potential Use as Supplementary Cementitious Material. CEMENT, v. 19, p. 100126, 2025.

SNIC – Sindicato Nacional da Indústria do Cimento. Relatório Anual, 2023.

UN - UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME & GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION. Not just another brick in the wall: The solutions exist- Scaling them will build on progress and cut emissions fast. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, 2025.

UN ENVIRONMENT, SCRIVENER, K.L.; JOHN, V.M.; GARTNER, E.M. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, v. 114, p. 2-26, 2018.

VENANCIO, R. J. M. Análise de resíduos industriais utilizados na produção de blends para coprocessamento: uma visão sob o ponto de vista energético. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências e Técnicas Nucleares), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, 2022.

WANG, Y.; ZHU, Q.; GENG, Y. Trajectory and Driving Factors for GHG Emissions in the Chinese Cement Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 53, p. 252–60, 2013.

WANG, Z.; HUANG, X; HUANG, Q.; DING, A. Environmental impacts of aerosol radiative effect and urbanization and their interactions over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei City cluster. Urban Climate, v. 56, p. 102020, 2024.

YANG, H.; XIA, J.; THOMPSON, J.R.; FLOWER, R.J. Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China. Waste Management, v. 63, p. 393-396.

ZAFAR, M.W.; MIRZA, F.M.; ZAIDI, S.A.H.; HOU, F. The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 26, p. 15162-15173, 2019.

Published

15-10-2025

How to Cite

Magalhães, R. F. de, Sotelo, D. G., Medeiros, M. H. G. de, Bueno, J. P. M., & Kirchheim, A. P. (2025). Circularity strategies in the cement industry: Challenges and opportunities for co-processing in Rio Grande do Sul. Latin American and European Meeting on Sustainable Buildings and Communities, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46421/euroelecs.v6.8082