RELAÇÕES ENTRE FORMA URBANA, ASPECTOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS E COMPORTAMENTO DE VIAGEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.438070Palabras clave:
Comportamento de viagem, Eficiência energética, Transporte, Forma urbanaResumen
Os países em desenvolvimento, especialmente nas últimas décadas do século XX, assistiram elevadas taxas de urbanização, que culminaram no crescimento caótico das cidades. Entre as atividades afetadas por tal modelo de desenvolvimento encontra-se a da circulação de pessoas e bens, que concentra grande demanda energética e um alto volume de emissões na cidade. O problema se acentuou na medida em que os automóveis foram eleitos como meios preferenciais de transporte. O modelo contradiz na prática, os achados de extensa literatura considerando que os meios de transporte coletivos e ativos estão relacionados a índices de consumo de energia e emissões muito melhores que os carros, e, por isso, seriam considerados mais sustentáveis. Nesse sentido, o trabalho lança mão da revisão de literatura para analisar como os aspectos socioeconômicos e de forma urbana se relacionam com o comportamento de viagem e quais políticas públicas seriam interessantes para moldá-lo. Conclui-se que os aspectos que parecem estar mais relacionados a comportamentos de viagem mais eficientes são densidade, uso do solo, renda, transporte público eficiente e preço do combustível. No entanto, é necessário um estudo profundo de cada caso, visto que esta é uma questão subordinada aos aspectos culturais, econômicos e históricos de cada região.
Citas
AGUILÉRA, Anne; VOISIN, Marion. Urban form , commuting patterns and CO2 emissions : Whatdifferences between the municipality ’ s residents and its jobs ? Transportation Research Part Ajournal, [S. l.], v. 69, p. 243–251, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.012.
BANISTER, D.; WATSON, S.; WOOD, C. Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, [S. l.], v. 24, p. 125–143, 1997.
BAPTISTA, Patrícia; MELO, Sandra; ROLIM, Catarina. Energy , environmental and mobilityimpacts of car-sharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon , Portugal. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences, [S. l.], v. 111, p. 28–37, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.035. Disponívelem: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.035.
BERTAUD, Alain. Metropolis: A Measure of the Spatial Organization of 7 Large Cities. [S. l.],2001.
BREHENY, Michael. The compact city and transport energy consumption. Transactions of theInstitute of British Geographers, [S. l.], v. 20, p. 81–101, 1995.
BROWNSTONE, David; GOLOB, Thomas F. The impact of residential density on vehicle usageand energy consumption ✩. Journal of Urban Economics, [S. l.], v. 65, p. 91–98, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.002. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.002.
BÜCHS, Milena; SCHNEPF, Sylke V. Who emits most? Associations between socio-economicfactors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions.
Ecological Economics, [S. l.], v. 90, p. 114–123, 2013.
CAO, X.; MOKHTARIAN, P. L.; HANDY, S. L. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-selectionon Travel Behavior: A Focus on Empirical Findings. In: VENEZIA, Elizabetta (org.). UrbanSustainable Mobility. Milão.
CERVERO, R. The challenge for transport and how it shapes the city. In: PERTH - BEYOND 2000:A CHALLENGE FOR THE CITY 1992a, Perth. Anais [...]. Perth p. 33–36.
CERVERO, R. Futuristic transit and futuristic cities. Transportation Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 46, p. 193–204, 1992. b.
DING, Chuan; WANG, Donggen; LIU, Chao; ZHANG, Yi; YANG, Jiawen. Exploring the influenceof built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of carownership and travel distance. [S. l.], v. 100, p. 65–80, 2017.
ECHENIQUE, Marcial H.; HARGREAVES, Anthony J.; MITCHELL, Gordon; NAMDEO, Anil. GrowingCities Sustainably. Journal of the American Planning Association, [S. l.], v. 78, p. 121–137, 2012.
b. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2012.666731.
EWING, Reid. Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable? Journal of the American PlanningAssociation, [S. l.], v. 63, p. 107–126, 1997. DOI: 10.1080/01944369708975728.
EWING, Reid; CERVERO, Robert. Travel and the Built Environment - A Synthesis. TransportationResearch Record, [S. l.], 2001.
EWING, Reid; HAMIDI, Shima. Compactness versus Sprawl: A Review of Recent Evidence fromthe United States. Journal of Planning Literature, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 413–432, 2015. DOI:10.1177/0885412215595439.
FIRNKORN, Jörg; MÜLLER, Martin. What will be the environmental effects of new free-floatingcar-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecological Economics, [S. l.], v. 70, p. 1519–1528, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014. Disponível em:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014.
FOCAS, Caralampo. Travel behaviour and CO2 emissions in urban and exurban London and New York. Transport Policy, [S. l.], v. 46, p. 82–91, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.11.003.
Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.11.003.
GOMEZ-IBANEZ, A. A global view of automobile dependence. Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association, [S. l.], v. 57, p. 376–379, 1991.
GORDON, Peter; KUMAR, Ajay; RICHARDSON, Harry W. The Influence of Metropolitan SpatialStructure on Commuting Time *. Journal of Urban Economics, [S. l.], v. 26, p. 138–151, 1989.
GORDON, Peter; RICHARDSON, Harry W. Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Reply. Journalof the American Planning Association, [S. l.], v. 55, p. 342–346, 1989. DOI:10.1080/01944368908975421.
GORDON, Peter; RICHARDSON, Harry W. Are compact cities a Desirable Planning Goal?Journal of the American Planning Association, [S. l.], v. 63, p. 95–106, 1997.
GRAZI, Fabio; VAN DEN BERGH, Jeroen C. J. M.; VAN OMMEREN, Jos N. An Empirical Analysisof Urban Form, Transport, and Global Warming. The Energy Journal, [S. l.], v. 29, p. 97–122,2008.
HOLTZCLAW, John. Using Residential Patterns and Transit To Decrease Auto Dependence andCosts. São Francisco.
IEA. Total final consumption (TFC) by sector, World 1990-2018. 2020. Disponível em:https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/?country=WORLD&fuel=Energyconsumption&indicator=TFCShareBySector. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2020.
JENKS, Mike. Compact City. United Kingdom. DOI: 10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0530.
KALENOJA, Hanna. ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PASSENGERTRANSPORT MODES - A LIFE CYCLE STUDY ON PASSENGER TRANSPORT MODES. In: ANNUALTRANSPORT CONFERENCE AT AALBORG UNIVERSITY 1996, Anais [...]. [s.l: s.n.]KENWORTHY. Transport Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases in Urban Passenger TransportSystems : A Study of 84 Global Cities. In: INTERNATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY CONFERENCE 2003,Fremantle. Anais [...]. FremantleKENWORTHY, Jeffrey. The eco-city: Ten Key Transport and Planning Dimensions for SustainableCity Development. Environmental and Urbanization, [S. l.], v. 18, p. 67–85, 2006. DOI:10.1177/0956247806063947.
KENWORTHY, Jeffrey R.; LAUBE, Felix B. AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE IN CITIES: ANINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF URBAN TRANSPORT AND LAND USE PATTERNS WITHIMPLICATIONS FOR SUSTAINABILITY. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [S. l.], v. 16, p.279–308, 1996.
KIRWAN, Richard. Urban form , Energy and Transport : A Note on The Newman-KenworthyThesis. Urban policy and research, [S. l.], v. 10, n. April 2015, p. 6–23, 1992. DOI:10.1080/08111149208551480.
KOSAI, Shoki; YUASA, Muku; YAMASUE, Eiji. Chronological Transition of Relationship betweenIntracity Lifecycle Transport Energy Efficiency and Population Density. Energies, [S. l.], v. 13, p.2094, 2020.
KUMAR, Ashish; PRASAD, Lal Bahadur. Issues, Challenges and Future Prospects of ElectricVehicles: A Review. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, POWER ANDCOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (GUCON) 2018, India. Anais [...]. IndiaKUMAR, Rajeev Ranjan; KUMAR, Alok. Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review andprospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, [S. l.], v. 253, 2020.
LEFÈVRE, Benoit; MAINGUY, Gaëll. Urban Transport Energy Consumption: Determinants andStrategies for its Reduction. An analysis of the literature. Cities and climate change, [S. l.], v. 2,2009.
LIU, Chao; SHEN, Qing. Computers , Environment and Urban Systems An empirical analysis of the influence of urban form on household travel and energy consumption. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 5, p. 347–357, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.006. Disponível em:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.006.
MANAUGH, Kevin; MIRANDA-MORENO, Luis F.; EL-GENEIDY, Ahmed M. The effect ofneighbourhood characteristics, accessibility, home–work location, and demographics oncommuting distances distances. Transportantion, [S. l.], v. 37, p. 627–646, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s11116-010-9275-z.
MINDALI, Orit; RAVEH, Adi; SALOMON, Ilan. Urban density and energy consumption : a newlook at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A, [S. l.], v. 38, p. 143–162, 2004. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2003.10.004.
NAMDEO, Anil; GOODMAN, Paul; MITCHELL, Gordon; HARGREAVES, Anthony; ECHENIQUE,Marcial. Land-use , transport and vehicle technology futures: An air pollution assessment ofpolicy combinations for the Cambridge Sub-Region of the UK. Cities, [S. l.], v. 89, p. 296–307,2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.004. Disponível em:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.004.
NECHYBA, Thomas J.; WALSH, Randall P. Urban Sprawl. Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, [S.
l.], v. 18, p. 177–200, 2004.
NEWMAN, Peter; KENWORTHY, Jeffrey. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobiledependence. [s.l.] : Island Press, 1999.
NEWMAN, Peter; KENWORTHY, Jeffrey; VINTILA, Peter. Can we overcome automobiledependence? Physical planning in an age of urban cynicism. Cities, [S. l.], v. 12, p. 53–65, 1995.
NEWMAN, Peter W. G.; KENWORTHY, Jeffrey R. Gasoline Consumption and Cities A Comparison ofU.S. Cities with a Global Survey. Journal of the American Planning Association ISSN:, [S. l.], v. 55, p.
24–37, 1989. DOI: 10.1080/01944368908975398.
NEWMAN, Peter W. G.; KENWORTHY, Jeffrey R. Transport and urban form in thirty ‐ two of the world’ s principal cities. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, [S. l.], v. 11, p. 249–272, 1991.
NEWMAN, Peter W. G.; KENWORTHY, Jeffrey R. The land use-transport connection An overview.
Land Use Policy, [S. l.], v. 13, p. 1–22, 1996.
NORMAN, Jonathan; MACLEAN, Heather L.; ASCE, M.; KENNEDY, Christopher A. Comparing Highand Low Residential Density: Life-Cycle Analysis of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, [S. l.], v. 132, p. 10–21, 2006. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132.
O’NEILL, Brian C.; CHEN, Belinda S. Demographic Determinants of Household Energy Use in theUnited States. JSTOR, [S. l.], v. 28, p. 53–88, 2002.
OICA - INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS. Motorization Rate2015 - WorldWide. [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.oica.net/category/vehicles-in-use/. Acessoem: 23 fev. 2021.
OSWALD, Yannick; OWEN, Anne; STEINBERGER, Julia K. Large inequality in international andintranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories.
Nature Energy, [S. l.], v. 5, p. 231–239, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8. Disponível em:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8.
OWENS, S. Energy conscious planning. In: CONCIUL FOR THE PROTECTION OF RURAL ENGLAND1991, Londres. Anais [...]. LondresOWENS, S. Energy, environmental sustainability and land-use planning. In: SustainableDevelopment and Urban Form. Londres. p. 79–105, 1992.
PAN, Haixiao; SHEN, Qing; ZHANG, Ming. Influence of Urban Form on Travel Behaviour in FourNeighbourhoods of Shanghai. Urban Studies, [S. l.], v. 46, p. 275–294, 2009.
PETERS, Deike. Gender and Transport in Less Developed Countries: A Background Paper in Preparation for CSD-9. [S. l.], 2002.
POORTINGA, Wouter; STEG, Linda; VLEK, Charles. VALUES , ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN , ANDENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR: A Study Into Household Energy Use. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, [S.
l.], v. 36, p. 70–93, 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0013916503251466.
POUDENX, Pascal. The effect of transportation policies on energy consumption and greenhousegas emission from urban passenger transportation. Transportation Research Part A, [S. l.], v. 42, p.
901–909, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.013.
RAJPER, Sarmad Zaman; ALBRECHT, Johan. Prospects of Electric Vehicles in the DevelopingCountries: A Literature Review. sustainability, [S. l.], v. 12, 2020.
RAMANATHAN, R. Estimating energy consumption of transport modes in India using DEA andapplication to energy and environmental policy. [S. l.], v. 56, n. 2005, p. 732–737, 2005. DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601866.
RATY, R.; CARLSSON-KANYAMA, A. Energy consumption by gender in some European countries.
Energy Policy, [S. l.], v. 38, p. 646–649, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.010.
SHAHEEN, Susan. Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ridehailing and Pooling. In: Three Revolutions.
Washington: Island Press, 2018. p. 55–76.
SHEKARCHIAN, M.; MOGHAVVEMI, M.; ZARI, F.; MOGHAVVEMI, S.; MOTASEMI, F.; MAHLIA, T. M. I.
Impact of infrastructural policies to reduce travel time expenditure of car users with significantreductions in energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [S. l.], v. 77, p.
327–335, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.015.
SHIM, Gyo-Eon; RHEE, Sung-Mo; AHN, Kun-Hyuck; CHUNG, Sung-Bong. The relationship betweenthe characteristics of transportation energy consumption and urban form. The Annals of RegionalScience, [S. l.], v. 40, p. 351–367, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-005-0051-5.
SORENSE, Paul. Moving Los Angeles. ACESS magazine, [S. l.], v. 1, p. 16–24, 2009.
STEAD, Dominic. Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns inBritain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 499–528, 2001.
SUN, Bindong; ERMAGUN, Alireza; DAN, Bo. Built environmental impacts on commuting modechoice and distance: Evidence from Shanghai. Transportation Research Part D, [S. l.], v. 52, p. 441–453, 2017.
UNITED NATIONS. World Urbanization Prospects. New York.
USÓN, Alfonso Aranda; CAPILLA, Antonio Valero; BRIBIÁN, Ignacio Zabalza; SCARPELLINI, Sabina;SASTRESA, Eva Llera. Energy efficiency in transport and mobility from an eco-efficiency viewpoint.
Energy, [S. l.], v. 36, p. 1916–1923, 2011.
WANG, Zhaohua; AHMED, Zahoor; ZHANG, Bin; WANG, Bo; WANG, Bo. The nexus betweenurbanization , road infrastructure , and transport energy demand : empirical evidence fromPakistan. [S. l.], p. 34884–34895, 2019.
WEGENER, Michael; FÜRST, Franz. Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art. Dortmund.
WOODCOCK, James; BANISTER, David; EDWARDS, Phil; PRENTICE, Andrew M.; ROBERTS, Ian. Energyand transport. Lancet, [S. l.], v. 370, p. 1078–88, 2007.
YONG, Jia Ying; RAMACHANDARAMURTHY, Vigna K.; TAN, Kang Miao; MITHULANANTHAN, N. Areview on the state-of-the-art technologies of electric vehicle, its impacts and prospects.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [S. l.], v. 49, p. 365–385, 2015.
ZEGRAS, Christopher. The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence fromSantiago de Chile. Urban Studies, [S. l.], v. 47, p. 1793–1817, 2010.
ZHANG, Mengzhu; ZHAO, Pengjun. The impact of land-use mix on residents’ travel energyconsumption: New evidence from Beijing. Transportation Research Part D, [S. l.], v. 57, p. 224–236,2017.
