Princípios de design para apoio à participação em sistemas de gestão da segurança resilientes na construção

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/sibragec.v13i00.2892

Keywords:

Participação, Segurança, Saúde, Resiliência, Construção

Abstract

Embora a participação do trabalhador seja elemento comumente presente em sistemas de gestão da segurança na construção, a literatura ainda é limitada em responder como projetar sistemas com desempenho resiliente que favoreçam essa participação. Para preencher esta lacuna, esse estudo propõe um conjunto de princípios, desenvolvido através de uma revisão sistemática baseada em evidências, como mecanismo de apoio em projetos de sistemas de gestão de segurança resilientes e participativos na construção. A proposta contempla oito princípios que são descritos e exemplificados. Seu uso pode auxiliar os projetistas, tanto na concepção de novos sistemas de gestão, quanto em ajustes nos sistemas previamente existentes. Novos estudos podem contribuir no refinamento ou identificação de novos princípios, como também para testar empiricamente arranjos participativos que, de forma explícita, apoiem o desempenho resiliente.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fabrício Borges Cambraia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Mestrado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Professor na Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (Juiz de Fora - MG, Brasil).

Carlos Torres Formoso, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorado em Engenharia Civil pela University of Salford. Professor na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil).

Tarcísio Abreu Saurin, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Professor na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil).

Iamara Rossi Bulhões, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Professora na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil).

References

ALBRECHTSEN, E.; SOLBERG, I.; SVENSLI, E. The application and benefits of job safety analysis. Safety Science, v. 113, p. 425-437, 2019.

ANDERSEN, L. P. S.; GRYTNES, R. Different ways of perceiving risk and safety on construction sites and implications for safety cooperation. Construction Management and Economics, v. 39, n. 5, p. 419-431, 2021.

ARNSTEIN, S. R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, v. 35, n. 4, p. 216-224, 1969.

AYERS, G. F. et al. Meaningful and effective consultation and the construction industry of Victoria, Australia. Construction Management and Economics, v. 31, n. 6, p. 542-567, 2013.

BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006.

BUNIYA, M. K. et al. Critical success factors of safety program implementation in construction projects in Iraq. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 16, 2021.

BUSCK, O.; KNUDSEN, H.; LIND, J. The transformation of employee participation: consequences for the work environment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, v. 3, n. 31, p. 285-305, 2010

CLEGG, C. W.; WALL, T. D. The lateral dimension to employee participation. Journal of Management Studies, v. 21, n. 4, p. 429-442, 1984.

COTTON, J. L. et al. Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, v. 13, n. 1, p. 8-22, 1988.

DACHLER, H. P.; WILPERT, B. Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, p. 1-39, 1978.

DALE, A. M. et al. Evaluation of a participatory ergonomics intervention in small commercial construction firms. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, v. 59, n. 6, p. 465-475, 2016.

DEKKER, S. Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. Applied Ergonomics, v. 34, n. 3, p. 233-238, 2003.

DISCONZI, C. M. D. G.; SAURIN, T. A. Design for resilient performance: concept and principles. Applied Ergonomics, v. 101, 2022.

GRYTNES, R.; TUTT, D. E.; ANDERSEN, L. P. S. Developing safety cooperation in construction: between facilitating independence and tightening the grip. Construction Management and Economics, v. 38, n. 11, p. 977-992, 2020.

HAINES, H. et al. Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics, v. 45, n. 4, p. 309-327, 2002.

HALE, A.; BORYS, D. Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, v. 55, p. 207-221, 2013.

HE, C.; MCCABE, B.; JIA, G. Effect of leader-member exchange on construction worker safety behavior: safety climate and psychological capital as the mediators. Safety Science, v. 142, p. 105401, 2021.

HENDRICK, H. W.; KLEINER, B. M. Macroergonomics: an introduction to work system design. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001.

HESS, J. A. et al. Safety voice for ergonomics (SAVE): evaluation of a masonry apprenticeship training program. Applied Ergonomics, v. 86, 2020.

HINZE, J. Making Zero Injuries a Reality: a report to the construction industry institute. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2002. Report 160.

HOLLNAGEL, E,; WOODS, D, D.; LEVESON, N. (Ed.). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and precepts. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2006.

HOLLNAGEL, E. Introduction to the Resilience Analysis Grid (RAG), 2015. 15 p. (Technical Note)

HOLLNAGEL, E. Safety-II in Practice: Developing the Resilience Potentials. New York: Routledge, 2017. 130 p.

ILO-OSH, International Labour Organization. Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2001.

JESCHKE, K. C. et al. Process evaluation of a Toolbox-training program for construction foremen in Denmark. Safety Science, v. 94, p. 152-160, 2017.

JESCHKE, K. N. et al. Complaining about occupational safety and health: a barrier for collaboration between managers and workers on construction sites. Construction Management and Economics, v. 39, n. 6, p. 459-474, 2021.

LAITINEN, H.; RUOHOMÄKI, I. The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites. Safety Science, v. 24, n. 1, p. 61-73, 1996.

LIANG, Q.; LEUNG, M.; AHMED, K. How adoption of coping behaviors determines construction workers’ safety: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. Safety Science, v. 133, 2021.

LINGARD, H. et al. Looking and learning: using participatory video to improve health and safety in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, v. 33, n. 9, p. 740-751, 2015.

MARTINS, J. B. et al. Integrating Safety-I and Safety-II: Learning from failure and success in construction sites. Safety Science, v. 148, 2022.

MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, v. 8, n. 5, p. 336-341, 2009.

NEAL, A.; GRIFFIN, M, A.; HART, P. M. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, v. 34, n. 1-3, p. 99-109, 2000.

OSWALD, D.; LINGARD, H. Development of a frontline H&S leadership maturity model in the construction industry. Safety Science, v. 118, p. 674-686, 2019.

PARÉ, G. et al. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, v. 52, n. 2, p. 183-199, 2015.

PEÑALOZA, G. A.; FORMOSO, C. T.; SAURIN, T. A. A resilience engineering-based framework for assessing safety performance measurement systems: a study in the construction industry. Safety Science, v. 142, 2021.

RIGHI, A. W.; SAURIN, T. A.; WACHS, P. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 141, p. 142-152, 2015.

SAURIN, T. A.; WERLE, N. J. B.. A framework for the analysis of slack in socio-technical systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 167, p. 439-451, 2017.

SHERRATT, F.; FARRELL, P.; NOBLE, R. UK construction site safety: discourses of enforcement and engagement. Construction Management and Economics, v. 31, n. 6, p. 623-635, 2013.

STILES, S.; RYAN, B.; GOLIGHTLY, D.. Evaluating attitudes to safety leadership within rail construction projects. Safety Science, v. 110, p. 134-144, 2018.

STRAUSS, G. Worker participation: some under-considered issues. Industrial Relations, v. 45, n. 4, p. 778-803, 2006.

THOMAS, R.; WHYBROW, K.; SCHARBER, C. A conceptual exploration of participation. Section III: utilitarian perspectives and conclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, v. 44, n. 8, p. 801-817, 2012.

TONNON, S. C. et al. Strategies of employees in the construction industry to increase their sustainable employability. Work, v. 59, n. 2, p. 249-258, 2018.

TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207-222, 2003.

VISSER, S. et al. The process evaluation of two alternative participatory ergonomics intervention strategies for construction companies. Ergonomics, v. 61, n. 9, p. 1156-1172, 2018.

WALTERS, D. et al. The role of worker representation and consultation in managing health and safety in the construction industry. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 2010.

WILKINSON, A. et al. Voices unheard: employee voice in the new century. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 29, n. 5, p. 711-724, 2018.

ZHANG, R. P.; LINGARD, H.; OSWALD, D. Impact of supervisory safety communication on safety climate and behavior in construction workgroups. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 146, n. 8, 2020.

Published

2023-11-05

How to Cite

CAMBRAIA, Fabrício Borges; FORMOSO, Carlos Torres; SAURIN, Tarcísio Abreu; BULHÕES, Iamara Rossi. Princípios de design para apoio à participação em sistemas de gestão da segurança resilientes na construção. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE GESTÃO E ECONOMIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO, 13., 2023. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2023. p. 1–6. DOI: 10.46421/sibragec.v13i00.2892. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/sibragec/article/view/2892. Acesso em: 3 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Gestão da Saúde e Segurança do Trabalho

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.