Análisis comparativo entre certificaciones de bienestar en el ambiente construido: WELL y Fitwel

Authors

  • Isadora Martins Costa FAUUSP
  • Pedro Caio de Carvalho Rossi
  • Alessandra Rodrigues Prata Shimomura FAU-USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/encacelacac.v18i1.7276

Keywords:

Wellness Certifications, Indoor Environmental Quality, WELL, Fitwel

Abstract

Humans spend most of their time indoors, making Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) essential for health and well-being. In this context, certifications such as WELL and Fitwel have been developed to establish guidelines for healthier and more sustainable environments. This study compared both certifications considering applicability, IEQ requirements, verification processes, costs, and adoption in Brazil. The results show that WELL has higher technical rigor, with greater costs and complexity. On the other hand, Fitwel is more accessible and flexible, which explains its wider adoption in Brazil, despite its lower focus on IEQ. The choice between them should consider the objectives and limitations of each project, aiming to improve environmental quality and occupant well-being.

References

CfAD. Certification. 2025c. Disponível em: https://www.fitwel.org/certification. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2025.

CfAD. Fitwel. 2025a. Disponível em: https://www.fitwel.org. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2025.

CfAD. Project Directory. 2025d. Disponível em: https://www.fitwel.org. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2025.

CfAD. Reference Guide for the Fitwel Certification System: Workplace. Nova York: Center for Active Design, 2025b

FISK, W. J.; BLACK, D.; BRUNNER, G.. Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. Indoor Air, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 5, p. 357-367, 4 maio 2011. Hindawi Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00719.x

IWBI. Certification Pricing. 2025b. Disponível em: https://www.wellcertified.com/certification/v2/pricing. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2025.

IWBI. WELL Projects Directory. 2025c. Disponível em: https://account.wellcertified.com/directories/projects/. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2025.

IWBI. WELL v2. 2025a. Disponível em: https://v2.wellcertified.com/en/wellv2/overview. Acesso em: 4 jul. 2025

KLEPEIS, Neil E.; NELSON, William C.; OTT, Wayne R.; ROBINSON, John P.; TSANG, Andy M.; SWITZER, Paul; BEHAR, Joseph V; HERN, Stephen C; ENGELMANN, William H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, [S.L.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 231-252, 1 jul. 2001. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165

LOFTNESS, Vivian; HAKKINEN, Bert; ADAN, Olaf; NEVALAINEN, Aino. Elements That Contribute to Healthy Building Design. Environmental Health Perspectives, Durham, v. 115, n. 6, p. 965-970, jun. 2007. Environmental Health Perspectives. DOI:10.1289/ehp.8988.

PREISER, Wolfgang F. E; VISCHER, Jacqueline C. (Ed.) Assessing Building Performance. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005.

SUNDELL, J.. On the history of indoor air quality and health. Indoor Air, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 7, p. 51-58, ago. 2004. Hindawi Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00273.x

WARGOCKI, P.; SUNDELL, J.; BISCHOF, W.; BRUNDRETT, G.; FANGER, P. O.; GYNTELBERG, F.; HANSSEN, S. O.; HARRISON, P.; PICKERING, A.; SEPPÄNEN, O.. Ventilation and health in non-industrial indoor environments: report from a european multidisciplinary scientific consensus meeting (euroven). Indoor Air, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 113-128, jun. 2002. Hindawi Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01145.x

XIE, Xiaohuan; WANG, Ruobing; GOU, Zhonghua. Incorporating motivation and execution into healthy building rating systems based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Building And Environment, [S.L.], v. 222, p. 109452, ago. 2022. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109452

Published

2025-08-16

How to Cite

MARTINS COSTA, Isadora; CAIO DE CARVALHO ROSSI, Pedro; RODRIGUES PRATA SHIMOMURA, Alessandra. Análisis comparativo entre certificaciones de bienestar en el ambiente construido: WELL y Fitwel. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CONFORTO NO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, 18., 2025. Anais [...]. [S. l.], 2025. DOI: 10.46421/encacelacac.v18i1.7276. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/encac/article/view/7276. Acesso em: 3 may. 2026.

Issue

Section

7. Conforto Ergonômico e Qualidade Ambiental