REQUISITOS DE DESEMPENHO E EFICIÊNCIA ENERGÉTICA PRESENTES EM CERTIFICAÇÕES AMBIENTAIS: LEED E BREEAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v18i.976Keywords:
Environmental certification, LEED, BREEAM, Energy performanceAbstract
Mitigate environmental impacts require changes in the patterns of production and consumption. In this context, green buildings are key because it has characteristics and strategies more consistent with the planet's regenerative capacity. In this way, civil construction can be guided by the requirements of environmental certifications, that address the key importance of energy efficiency and the thermal performance of buildings. Internationally, LEED and BREEAM certification stand out. In the present work, it is investigated, through literature review, how the theme of environmental certification and the energy performance of buildings have been correlated. The results indicate that many articles address both themes and there is no predominance of a line of research. And there is a reduced number of articles that investigate the costs of certifications and their impact on the comfort of users. Green buildings play a big role in sustainable development and investigate how they affect energy consumption, as well as user comfort, is essential.
References
ABDEL-AAL, M.F. et al. Wakala buildings of Mamluk era in Cairo, Egypt and how far they meet the rating criteria of LEED V4 (2018). Alexandria Eng. J., 57 (4), pp. 3793-3803.
ABRAHAM, T.G. et al. Energy conservation measures for an office building in warm and humid climate (2016). Indian J. of Science and Technology, 9 (44), art. no. 105318.
AKCAY, E.C., ARDITI, D. Desired points at minimum cost in the “Optimize Energy Performance” credit of leed certification (2017). J. of Civil Engineering and Management, 23 (6), pp. 796-805.
ALTOMONTE, S. et al. Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings (2019). Building Research and Information, 47 (3), pp. 255-274.
BAJA, F.D.F. et al. Leed gold but not equal: Two case study buildings (2019) Int. J. of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 14 (1), pp. 52-62.
BERNARDI, E. et al. An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings (2017). Sustainability 9 (1226), 1–27.
BESEN, P., BOARIN, P. The future of historic buildings: Retrofitting to improve the thermal performance of New Zealand architectural heritage (2018). WIT Trans. on Ecology and the Environ., 217, pp.15-27.
BISEGNA, F. et al. Influence of insulating materials on green building rating system results (2016).
Energies, 9 (9), art. no. 712.
CHENG, W., BEHZADSODAGAR, F. Comparative analysis of environmental performance of an office building using BREEAM and GBL (2017). Int. J. of Sust. Dev. and Planning,12(3),pp.528-540.
CLEMENT, S. et al. The Procura+ Manual: A Guide to Implementing Sustainable Procurement, 3rd Edition. Friburgo, Alemanha. 2016. Procura+. Disponível em: .
DE OLIVEIRA, J.C., DE FARIA, A.C. Economic impact of sustainable construction: The renovation of the Mineirão Stadium (2019). Urbe, 11, art. no. e20180031,GBC Brasil. Conheça a certificação LEED. 2019. GBC Brasil. Disponível em: <https://www.gbcbrasil.org.br/certificacao/certificacao-leed/>.
GREENAN, R., MUIR, B. New Zealand's building performance pathways (2017). Int. J. of Sust. Develop.
and Planning, 12 (2), pp. 252-263.
GURGUN, A.P., ARDITI, D. Assessment of energy credits in LEED-certified buildings based on certification levels and project ownership (2018). Buildings, 8 (2), art. no. 29.
KAZAZ, A., ISTIL, S.A. A comparative analysis of sunshine duration effects in terms of renewable energy production rates on the LEEDBD+ C projects in Turkey. (2019) Energies, 12(6),art.no. 1116.
KIM, S.-K. et al. Occupant comfort and satisfaction in green healthcare environments: A survey study focusing on healthcare staff (2015) J. of Sustain. Develop., 8(1), pp.156-173.
NEMRY, F. et al. Options to reduce the environmental impacts of residential buildings in the European Union-Potential and costs. Energy and Buildings, v. 42, n. 7, p. 976–984, 2010.
OBERTI, I., PLANTAMURA, F. The inclusion of natural elements in building design: The role of green rating systems (2017). Int. J. of Sust. Develop. and Planning, 12 (2), pp. 217-226.
PALMER, K., WALLS, M. Using information to close the energy efficiency gap: a review of benchmarking and disclosure ordinances (2017). Energy Efficiency, 10 (3), pp. 673-691.
PRITCHARD, R., KELLY, S. Realising operational energy performance in non-domestic buildings: Lessons learnt from initiatives applied in Cambridge (2017). Sustainability, 9 (8), art. no. 1345.
PUGLIERO, V.S. et al. Overview of certification methodologies for sustainable constructions of Brazilian buildings (2015).Am. J. of Applied Sciences,12(3),pp.216-221.
PUSHKAR, S. A comparative analysis of gold leadership in energy and environmental design for new construction 2009 certified projects in Finland, Sweden, Turkey, and Spain (2018). Applied Sciences(Switzerland), 8 (9), art. no. 1496.
REEVES, T. et al. Guidelines for using BIM for energy analysis of buildings (2015). Buildings,5(4),pp.1361-1388.
REY-HERNÁNDEZ, J.M. et al. Energy analysis at a near zero energy building. A case-study in Spain (2018). Energies, 11 (4), art. no. 857.
SHIN, M.H. et al. LEED, its efficacy and fallacy in a regional context-An Urban heat island case in California (2017). Sustainability(Switzerland), 9(9), no. 1674.
SUN, X. et al. Strengths and weaknesses of existing building green retrofits: Case study of a LEEDEBOM gold project (2018). Energies, 11 (8), art. no. 1936,.
STOJANOVSKA-GEORGIEVSKA, L. et al. An empirical survey on the awareness of construction developers about green buildings in Macedonia (2018) Thermal Science, 22, pp. 897-907.
UNEP, U. N. E. P. The Impacts of SPP: Eight Illustrative Case Studies. UNEP. Paris, France, 2012.
WANG, X., WU, N.Q., QIAO, Y., SONG, Q.B. Assessment of energy-saving practices of the hospitality industry in Macau (2018). Sustainability (Switzerland), 10 (1), art. no. 255.
