CODESIGN INSTRUMENTS TO THE PROJECT PROCESS: ANALYSIS OF DYNAMICS WITH USERS AND DESIGNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.438103Keywords:
Codesign, Physical model, Virtual realityAbstract
This article presents the results of a workshop carried out with codesign instruments to improve the communication between building designers and users. The instruments to be used in the design discussion simulation, in dynamics with the participation of the researchers as intermediaries, were studied and determined from a literature review. The instruments determined were a two-dimensional physical model, a three-dimensional physical model and an electronic model with panoramic visualization through virtual reality glasses. The dynamics carried out showed that the mix of different physical instruments and the digital instrument can be productive for the design discussion, each one being more suitable at different moments of the design cycle, depending on the design phase of the project. The work is limited to one study and indicates the need for further similar studies based on this experience.
References
AZUMA, M. H. Customização em massa de projeto de habitação de interesse social por meio demodelos físicos paramétricos. 2016. Tese (Doutorado) – Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo,Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, 2016.
BRANDT, E.; MESSETER, R. Facilitating collaboration through design games. In: Conference onParticipatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices, 8, 2004.Anais… Toronto: ACM, 2004.
CAIXETA, M. C. B. F.; FABRICIO, M. M. Métodos e instrumentos de apoio ao codesign noprocesso de projeto de edifícios. Ambiente Construído (Online), v. 18, p. 111-131, 2018.
CAIXETA, M. C. B. F.; FABRICIO, M. M.; TZORTZOPOULOS, P. User Involvement at the earlystages of Design: A Case Study in Healthcare. In: International Postgraduate ResearchConference, 11, 2013. Anais… Salford: University of Salford, 2013, p. 75-1-10.
DELIBERADOR, M. S.; KOWALTOWSKI, D. C. C. K. O jogo como ferramenta de apoio aoprograma arquitetônico de escolas públicas. PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção, v.3, n. 2, p. 85-102, 2015.
DE SANTI, M. M.; UTTEMBERGHE, D.; CAIXETA, M. C. B. F. Metodologia de Codesign. In:CAIXETA, M. C. B. F.; CAMELO, G. H.; FABRICIO, M. M. (org). Codesign e arquitetura para asaúde. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books, 2021. p. 89-130.
HASANIN, A. A. Cultural Diversity And Reforming Social Behavior: A Participatory DesignApproach to Design Pedagogy. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of ArchitecturalResearch, v. 7, n. 2, p. 92–101, 2013.
IMAI, C.; AZUMA, M. H.; RODRIGUES, R.; ZALITE, M. . O modelo tridimensional físico comoinstrumento de simulação na habitação social. Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos, v. 10, n. 2,p. 7-19, 2015.
LAHTINEN, M.; NENONEN, S.; RASILA, H. LEHTELÄ, J.; RUOHOMÄKI, V.; REIJULA, K. Rehabilitationcenters in change: Participatory methods for managing redesign and renovation. HERD:Health Environments Research & Design Journal, v. 7, n. 2, p. 57-75, 2014.
SANDERS, E. B.-N.; STAPPERS, P. J. Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design. CoDesign,v. 4, n. 1, p. 5-18, 2008.
VAAJAKALLIO, K. Design games as a tool, a mindset and a structure. 2012. Tese (Doutorado)– School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland, 2012.
VAN OEL, C. J.; MLIHI, M.; FREEKE, A. Design Models for Single Patient Rooms Tested for PatientPreferences. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2021;14(1):31-46.doi:10.1177/1937586720937995
