Conventional system x sifonic system: a technical-economic analysis in use in predial systems of pluvial

Authors

  • Fabiane Sasso Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Vinívius Scortegagna Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Rafaela Vicenzi Pagnussat Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Vera Fernandes Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Simone Fiori Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Anelise Sertoli Lopes Universidade de Passo Fundo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/sispred.v1i.1611

Keywords:

Rainwater, Conventional System, Siphonic System, Comparation, Technical-Economically

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Increasingly, the construction sector demands efficient solutions aligned with innovation. In Brazil, the building water systems follow the requirements of NBR 10844 / (ABNT, 1989) where the systems are designed as a free duct. The syphonic system appears as an alternative, acting as a forced conduit. In the present study, two buildings were evaluated in a city in northern Rio Grande do Sul, an industrial warehouse with a large coverage area, and a hospital building with a smaller roof. The systems of the two buildings were dimensioned with rainfall indices of 125 mm / h and 180 mm / h and respective return periods of 5 and 25 years. We also analyzed the characteristics of both regarding the construction process and operation. The acquired information of the characteristics of each one made possible a technical and economical comparison of the costs, advantages and disadvantages, considering applicability in industrial and conventional works. The survey of materials and their implementation costs for the two situations in each of the buildings was developed. The syphonic system stood out as a more complete system, easy assembly and eliminating large amounts of vertical conductors from the façades, but this resulted in a cost of 6 to 8 times the cost of the conventional system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR10844: Instalações prediais de águas pluviais. Rio de Janeiro, 1989.

SAINT GOBAIN, EPEMS, sistema anti-vórtice de captação e drenagem de águas pluviais. Disponível em: https://www.sgpam.com.br/artigos/epams-sistema-antivortice-de-captacao-e-drenagem-de-aguas-pluviais. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2019.

SINAPI. Disponível em: <http://www.caixa.gov.br/poder-publico/apoio-poderpublico/sinapi/Paginas/default.aspx>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2019.

ULMETA. Tetometal Construções Ltda. Disponível em: http://www.sulmeta.com.br/. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2019.

VALSIR. Grupo empresarial Valsir, Disponível em: http://www.valsir.it/en/panoramicaraiplus/prodotti/raiplus/panoramica-rainplus. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2019.

Published

2019-10-04

How to Cite

SASSO, Fabiane; SCORTEGAGNA, Vinívius; VICENZI PAGNUSSAT, Rafaela; FERNANDES, Vera; FIORI, Simone; SERTOLI LOPES, Anelise. Conventional system x sifonic system: a technical-economic analysis in use in predial systems of pluvial . In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DE SISTEMAS PREDIAIS, 1., 2019. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2019. DOI: 10.46421/sispred.v1i.1611. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/sispred/article/view/1611. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.