Collaborative model for the design process of modular construction companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v20i1.6363Keywords:
modular construction, planning and control, design, collaborationAbstract
The design process for construction developments has been explored through the lens of production management concepts and practices, such as decision-making hierarchy and the necessity of collaboration among stakeholders for success. However, these studies often downplay collaborative processes and focus on the traditional construction market. In response, this article proposes a model for the design process of modular construction companies, with the distinctive feature of explicitly detailing the essential collaborative practices for its operation. The model was developed through Design Science Research in partnership with a modular construction company and consists of seven stages divided into two phases. Collaborative practices were mapped as direct (meetings), where participants communicate, establish commitments, and exchange information, and indirect practices, which induce collaboration through transparency and visualization mechanisms. The study demonstrates how collaboration can be implemented in the planning and control process of projects, highlighting its relevance for management in complex and dynamic environments.
References
INNELLA, F.; ARASHPOUR, M.; BAI, Y. Lean Methodologies and Techniques for Modular Construction: chronological and critical
review. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, v. 145, n. 12, p. 1-18, dez. 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/
(asce)co.1943-7862.0001712.
OLAWUMI, T. O.; CHAN, D. W.M.; OJO, S.; YAM, M.C.H.. Automating the modular construction process: a review of digital
technologies and future directions with blockchain technology. Journal Of Building Engineering, v. 46, p. 103720, abr. 2022. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103720.
BATAGLIN, F.S.; VIANA, D.D.; FORMOSO, C.T. Design Principles and Prescriptions for Planning and Controlling Engineer-to-Order
Industrialized Building Systems. Sustainability. v. 14, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416822
SAURIN, Tarcisio A.; GONZALEZ, Santiago S. Assessing the compatibility of the management of standardized procedures with the
complexity of a sociotechnical system: Case study of a control room in an oil refinery. Applied Ergonomics. v. 44, n. 5, p. 811-823.
sep. 2013.
MOLAVI, J.; BARRAL, D. L. A construction procurement method to achieve sustainability in modular construction. Procedia
engineering, v. 145, p. 1362-1369, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.201.
MOUNLA, K. E.; BELADJINE, D.; BEDDIAR, K.; MAZARI, B. Lean-BIM Approach for Improving the Performance of a Construction
Project in the Design Phase. Buildings, v. 13, n. 3, p. 654, 28 fev. 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030654.
SHEHAB, L.; HATTAB, M. A.; KHALIFE, S.; SAMAD, G. E.; ABBAS, Y.; HAMZEH, F. LPS Framework to Assess Planning Reliability in
Architectural Design. Preprints, p. 1-24, 4 out. 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0201.v1.
CHIU, S.; COUSINS, B. Last Planner System® in Design. Lean Construction Journal, Oakland, p. 78-99, 2020.
FUNDLI, I.S.; DREVLAND, F. Collaborative Design Management—A Case Study. In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL
GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION, 22., 2014, Oslo, Proceedings [...] Oslo, Norway, 25–27 June 2014; pp. 627–638.
MÄKI, Tarja; KEROSUO, Hannele. Design-related questions in the construction phase: the effect of using the last planner system in
design management. Canadian Journal Of Civil Engineering, v. 47, n. 2, p. 132-139, fev. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/
cjce-2018-0382.
KLEINSMANN, M.S. Understanding Collaborative Design. 2006. 309 f. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The
Netherlands, 2006.
MARCH, S.T.; SMITH, G. F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, v. 15, n. 4,
p.251-266, 1995.
VAN AKEN, J. E. Management research on the basis of the design paradigm: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological
rules. Journal of Management Studies, v. 41, n. 2, p. 219-246, 2004.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001.