CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS IN EDUCATIONAL BUILDINGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.438018Keywords:
Educational Building, Performance, Assessment, Post Ocuppancy EvaluationAbstract
The evaluation of performance in buildings is an important aspect within the field of construction management, as it determines several factors, such as the energy efficiency of the building, the need for maintenance and the degree of satisfaction of its occupants. Postoccupational assessment is one of the most popular forms of performance analysis, but it doesn’t have defined criteria that suit different types of buildings, such as educational ones. Therefore, the aim of this article is to conduct a systematic review, seeking to list the criteria used in evaluating the performance of educational buildings. The review was conducted in four research bases, and data were analyzed using the 5W1H tool. For data collection and quantification, the following questions were asked: Who wrote the article?; Where and what type of school building was addressed in the research?; When was the research published? ; What criteria are used for analysis? Why was the research developed?); What methods were used in the evaluation?. It was concluded that there is still a long way to go to create a standardization in the evaluation of the performance of educational buildings, but one of the best tools to conduct this type of evaluation is to analyze the opinion of the building's occupants.
References
ALI, Akram Syed et al. Open Source Building Science Sensors (OSBSS): A low-cost Arduino-basedplatform for long-term indoor environmental data collection. Building and Environment, v. 100, p. 114-126, 2016.
BONOMOLO, Marina et al. Cost optimal analysis of lighting retrofit scenarios in educational buildings inItaly. Energy Procedia, v. 126, p. 171-178, 2017.
DRESCH, A.; LACERDA, D. P.; ANTUNES JÚNIOR, J. A. V. Design science research: método de pesquisapara avanço da ciência e tecnologia. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.
DRIZA, Pamela-Jean N.; PARK, Nam-Kyu. Actual energy and water desempenho in LEED-certifiededucational buildings. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, v. 6, n. 4, p. 227-232, 2013.
EL ASMAR, Mounir; CHOKOR, Abbas; SROUR, Issam. Are building occupants satisfied with indoorenvironmental quality of higher education facilities?. Energy procedia, v. 50, p. 751-760, 2014.
EL-DARWISH, Ingy I.; EL-GENDY, Rana A. Post occupancy evaluation of thermal comfort in highereducational buildings in a hot arid climate. Alexandria engineering journal, v. 57, n. 4, p. 3167-3177,2018.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS ANÍSIO TEIXEIRA - INEP. Censo Escolar daEducação Básica 2013: Um resumo técnico. Brasília: O Instituto, 2014KARIMA, Mahbouba; ALTAN, Hasim. Interactive building environments: a case study university building inUAE. Procedia engineering, v. 180, p. 1355-1362, 2017.
KHALIL, Natasha et al. Desempenho Evaluation of Indoor Environment towards Sustainability for HigherEducational Buildings. Online Submission, 2011.
HALIL, Natasha; HUSIN, Husrul Nizam; NAWAWI, Abdul Hadi. An analytical literature: Strategicimprovement of sustainable building desempenho tool for Malaysia's Higher Institutions. Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences, v. 36, p. 306-313, 2012KHALIL, Natasha; KAMARUZZAMAN, Syahrul Nizam; BAHARUM, Mohamad Rizal. Ranking the indicators ofbuilding desempenho and the users’ risk via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Case of Malaysia.
Ecological Indicators, v. 71, p. 567-576, 2016.
KOWALTOWSKI, D. C. C. K. et al. Melhoria do conforto ambiental em edificações escolares na regiãode campinas. ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CONFORTO NO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, v. 2, 1999.
MICHAEL, Aimilios; HERACLEOUS, Chryso. Assessment of natural lighting desempenho and visual comfortof educational architecture in Southern Europe: The case of typical educational school premises inCyprus. Energy and Buildings, v. 140, p. 443-457, 2017.
MIJAKOWSKI, Maciej; SOWA, Jerzy. An attempt to improve indoor environment by installing humiditysensitive air inlets in a naturally ventilated kindergarten building. Building and Environment, v. 111, p. 180-191, 2017.
PELLEGRINO, Anna; CAMMARANO, Silvia; SAVIO, Valeria. Daylighting for Green schools: A resource forindoor quality and energy efficiency in educational environments. Energy Procedia, v. 78, p. 3162-3167,2015.
PINHEIRO, J. Q.; GÜNTHER, H. Métodos de pesquisa nos Estudos Pessoa- Ambiente. São Paulo: Casa doPsicólogo, 2008.
PREISER, Wolfgang FE. Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better. facilities, v. 13, n.11, p. 19-28, 1995.
RF, SAMPAIO. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica.2007.
ROPI, R. Mohammad; TABASSI, A. A. Study on Maintenance Practices for School Buildings in Terengganuand Kedah, Malaysia. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2014. p. 03003.
WANG, Changxin Cynthia; ZAMRI, Mohd Amri. Effect of IEQ on occupant satisfaction and study/workdesempenho in a green educational building: A case study. In: ICCREM 2013: Construction andOperation in the Context of Sustainability. 2013. p. 234-246.
Wong, N.H. and Jan, W.L.S. Total building desempenho evaluation of academic institution in Singapore.
Journal of Building and Environment, Vol. 38, pp. 161 – 176, 2003.
ZOMORODIAN, Zahra S.; TAHSILDOOST, Mohammad. Assessment of window desempenho in classroomsby long term spatial comfort metrics. Energy and Buildings, v. 134, p. 80-93, 2017.
