SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: THE POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION (POE) AND FACTORY OFFICE DESIGNS

Authors

  • Marta Elisa Riekstin Accioli Universidade de São Paulo
  • Sheila Walbe Ornstein Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.437990

Keywords:

Systematic literature review, Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Factory office designs

Abstract

This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is part of a master's thesis, which aims to investigate the retrofit design decisions adopted in a case study building - within an automobile manufacturing park, using the Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) instruments. The aim is to understand the implemented solutions and how these readjusted environments can contribute to work activities, thus enabling the redirection of future designs, with an emphasis on the quality of the built environment. The SLR was developed within three lines of research (POE's contribution to office design processes, office environments in automobile manufacturing parks and corporate office environments in general) aimed to obtain evidence from existing literature already published (from 2015 to the first quarter of 2020) in order to support the ongoing academic production and support new researches. The searches for records (periodical articles, book chapters, dissertations, and theses) were carried out in two scientific literature databases: Scopus and Web of Science besides the Researchgate social network and on the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations – BDLTD.

References

ABNT ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 15575-1: EdificaçõesHabitacionais [Parte 1: Requisitos Gerais]. Rio de Janeiro, 2013. 71 p.

_____. NBR ISO 41001: Facility Management – Sistemas de Gestão – Requisitos comOrientações para Uso. Rio de Janeiro, 2020. 55 p.

CLEMENTES-CROOME, Derek John. Creative and productive workplaces: a review. IntelligentBuildings International. London, v. 7, n. 4, p.1-20, 2015. Disponível em:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277969994_Creative_and_productive_workplaces_a_review>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2020.

CLEMENTES-CROOME, D. J. (Ed.). Creating the Productive Workplace: Places to WorkCreatively. 3 ed. London: Routledge, 2017. 466p.

CLEMENTS-CROOME, Derek John.; TURNER, Briony; PALLARIS, Kay. Flourishing workplaces: amultisensory approach to design and POE. Intelligent Buildings International. London, v. 1, n.

3-4, p. 131-144, 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17508975.2019.1569491>. Acesso em: 17 mar.2020.

CLEMENTS-CROOME, Derek John. The role of feedback in building design 1980–2018 andonwards. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, v. 40, n. 1, p. 5-12, 2019.

Disponível em: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0143624418812982>. Acessoem: 18 mar. 2020.

FLEURY-BAHI, G.; POL, E.; NAVARRO, O. (Eds). Handbook of Environmental Psychology andQuality of Life Research. Switzerland: Springer International, 2017.

FRANÇA, A.J.G.L. et al. Aplicação com enfoques diferenciados. In: Ono, R. et al. Avaliaçãopós-ocupação: na arquitetura, no urbanismo e no design: da teoria à prática. 1. ed. SãoPaulo: Oficina de Textos, 2018. 302 p.

FRANÇA, A. J. G. L. et al. Avaliação Pós-ocupação: Como desenvolver projetos melhoresavaliando edificações existentes. Archdaily, dez. 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.archdaily.com.br/br/907536/avaliacao-pos-ocupacao-como-desenvolverprojetos-melhores-avaliando-edificacoes-existentes>. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2020.

JAMROZIK, A. et al. Access to daylight and view in an office improves cognitive performanceand satisfaction and reduces eyestrain: A controlled crossover study. Building andEnvironment, v.165, p. 13, nov. 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013231930589X >. Acesso em: 17mar. 2020.

KEELING, T. P.; ROESCH, E. B.; CLEMENTS-CROOME, D. Cognitive Appraisals Affect BothEmbodiment of Thermal Sensation and Its Mapping to Thermal Evaluation. Frontiers inPsychology, v. 7, p. 12, jun. 2016. Disponível em:< https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921490/>. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2020.

KEELING, T.; CLEMENTS-CROOME, D.; ROESCH, E. The Effect of Agile Workspace and RemoteWorking on Experiences of Privacy, Crowding and Satisfaction. Buildings, v. 5, n. 3, p. 880-898, sep. 2015. Disponível em:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282420871_The_Effect_of_Agile_Workspace_an d_Remote_Working_on_Experiences_of_Privacy_Crowding_and_Satisfaction >. Acesso em:16 mar. 2020.

LOFTNESS, V. et al. Critical Frameworks for Building Evaluation: User Satisfaction, EnvironmentalMeasurements and the Technical Attributes of Building Systems (POE + M). In: PREISER, W.F.E.,HARDY, A.E., SCHRAMM, U. Building Performance Evaluation: From Delivery Process to LifeCycle Phases. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018, p. 29–48.

MIDDLEHURST, G. et al. A preliminary study on post-occupancy evaluation of four officebuildings in the UK based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Intelligent Building International,v. 10, n. 4, p. 234-246, 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17508975.2018.1495607>. Acesso em: 18 mar.2020.

ONO, R. et al. Avaliação pós-ocupação: na arquitetura, no urbanismo e no design: dateoria à prática. 1. ed. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2018. 302 p.

ORNSTEIN, S. W. Os campos da crítica e da avaliação pós-ocupação na arquitetura em uso.

Duas faces da mesma moeda? Arquitextos, São Paulo, ano 20, n. 230.03, 2019. Disponívelem: <https://www.vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/20.230/7480>. Acesso em: 07abr. 2020.

ORNSTEIN, S. W. Com os usuários em mente: um desafio para a boa prática arquitetônica?PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção, Campinas, SP, v. 7, n. 3, p. 189-197, out. 2016.

Disponível em:<https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8647437>. Acesso em:04 mar. 2019.

PARK, Jihyun; LOFTNESS, Vivian; AZIZ, Azizan. Post-occupancy evaluation and IEQmeasurements from 64 office buildings: Critical factors and thresholds for user satisfaction onthermal quality. Buildings, v. 8, n. 11, 2018. Disponível em: < https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/8/11/156 >. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2019.

PREISER, W.F.E., HARDY, A.E., SCHRAMM, U. Building Performance Evaluation: From DeliveryProcess to Life Cycle Phases. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018.

PROMES, M. Adapting to working environment change: Effects of mobility and flexibility. In:ELLERMANN, H.; KREUTTER, P.; MESSNER, W. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of ManagingContinuous Business Transformation, 2016. p. 553-584.

VISCHER, J., WIFI, M. The Effects of Workspace design on Quality of Life at Work. In: Fleury-Bahi,G., Pol, E., Navarro, O. Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research.

UK: Springer, 2015. cap.12. Disponível em: <https://f32658bb-cb9f-4725-9d6ca0117a05f2d2.filesusr.com/ugd/4f41d3_470799daaf0646adb86068824ee90935.pdf>. Acessoem: 22 mar. 2020.

VISCHER, J. User-Centred Workspace Design: Applications of environmental psychology tospace for work. In: Clements-Croome, D. Creating the Productive Workplace: Places to WorkCreatively. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2017. cap.4. Disponível em:<https://www.jacquelinevischerbiu.com/cservices>. Acesso em: 22 mar. 2020.

VISCHER, J. Building-in-use assessment: Foundation of Workspace Psychology. In: PREISER, W.

F. E., HARDY, A. E., SCHRAMM, U. Building Performance Evaluation. Springer InternationalPublishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. cap. 9. Disponível em:<https://www.jacquelinevischerbiu.com/cservices >. Acesso em: 22 mar. 2020.

Published

2021-11-19

How to Cite

Elisa Riekstin Accioli, M. ., & Walbe Ornstein, S. . (2021). SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: THE POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION (POE) AND FACTORY OFFICE DESIGNS. SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE QUALIDADE DE PROJETO DO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.437990

Issue

Section

Processos avaliativos: do projeto à pós-ocupação

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.