Applying pattern language as a mediation tool in a living lab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v19i1.1986Keywords:
Living labs, Solid waste management, Social housing, Visual methodsAbstract
Upgrading social housing can positively impact users' satisfaction, health conditions, quality of life and finances. Initiatives such as Living Labs (LLs) promote the development of user-centric solutions in collaboration with other stakeholders. This paper reports the partial results of an ongoing LL that aims to develop solutions to upgrading for solid waste management in a social housing estate. Illustrated cards were used as a mediation tool in a workshop to develop solutions with residents. The results indicate that the cards helped to improve the understanding of the upgrading possibilities and to conduct the dialogue.
References
ALEXANDER, C.; ISHIKAWA, S.; SILVERSTEIN, M. Uma Linguagem de Padrões - A Pattern Language. 1aed., Bookman, 2013.
ALMIRALL, E.; WAREHAM, J. Living Labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 23, n. 1, p. 87–102, 2011.
BERGVALL-KÅREBORN, B.; HOLST, M.; STÅHLBRÖST, A. Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. Em: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 11, 2009.
BOESS, S.; SILVESTER, S.; DE WAL, E.; DE WAL, O. Acting from a participatory attitude in a networked collaboration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, v. 2, p. 1–6, 2018.
BRIDI, M.; SOLIMAN-JUNIOR, J; GRANJA, D.; TZORTZOPOULOS, P., GOMES, V.; KOWALTOWSKI, D. Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 5, p. 2595, 2022.
CLARK, J.; LAING, K.; TIPLADY, L.; WOOLNER, P. Making Connections: Theory and Practice of Using Visual Methods to Aid Participation in Research Making Connections: Theory and Practice of Using Visual Methods to Aid Participation in Research, 2013.
CZISCHKE, D. Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, v. 18, n. 1, p. 55–81, 2018.
DELIBERADOR, M.; KOWALTOWSKI, D. Importância dos agentes para a arquitetura escolar: aplicação de jogo de apoio ao processo participativo. Ambiente Construído, v. 18, n. 2, p. 273–288, 2018.
ENOLL. About us - European Network of Living LabsEuropean Network of Living Labs., 2022. Disponível em: https://enoll.org/about-us/. Acesso em: 31 de maio de 2022
EPPLER, M.; PLATTS, K. Visual Strategizing. Long Range Planning, v. 42, n. 1, p. 42–74, 2009.
FOLTA, K.; LOCKTON, D.; BOWDEN, F. Recruitment of Participants (Households in City District and Companies) for Insight Research and Prototyping. Em: KEYSON, D.; GUERRA-SANTIN, O.; LOCKTON, D. (org.). Living Labs: Design and Assessment of Sustainable Living. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 241–245. E-book. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_18.
FREITAS, A.; AÑAÑA, E.; SCHRAMM, F. Método para captura e priorização de requisitos de futuros usuários de Habitações de Interesse Social. Ambiente Construído, v. 22, n. 1, p. 7–26, 2022.
GOMES, D.; TZORTZOPOULOS, P. BUILDING SHARED UNDERSTANDING DURING EARLY DESIGN. Em: ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION (IGLC), 2018, Chennai, India. Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Chennai, India: González, V.A., p. 11, 2018.
HASSELKUSS, M; BAEDEKER, C.; LIEDTKE, C. Social Practices as a Main Focus in Living Lab Research. Em: KEYSON, D.; GUERRA-SANTIN, O.; LOCKTON, D. (org.). Living Labs. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 22–34. E-book. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_5. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.
HEUTS, E.; VERSELE, A. RenoseeC: Renovating with a Social, Ecological and Economic Benefit through a Collective Approach. Energy Procedia, v. 96, p. 540–550, 2016.
HOSSAIN, M.; LEMINEN, S.; WESTERLUND, M. A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 213, p. 976–988, 2019.
INTILLE, S.; LARSON, K.; TAPIA, E., BEAUDIN, J.; KAUSHIK, P.; NAWYN, J.; ROCKINSON, R. Using a Live-In Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research. Em: FISHKIN, K. et al. (org.). Pervasive Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). v. 3968, p. 349–365. E-book. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/11748625_22. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2020.
KOWALTOWSKI, D.; MUIANGA, E.; GRANJA, D.; MOREIRA, D.; BERNARDINI, S.; CASTRO, M. A critical analysis of research of a mass-housing programme. Building Research & Information, v. 47, n. 6, p. 716–733, 2018.
LEMINEN, S. Q&A. What Are Living Labs?. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 5, n. 9, p. 7, 2015.
LEMINEN, S.; WESTERLUND, M. Categorization of Innovation Tools in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 7, n. 1, p. 11, 2017.
LIMA, L.; ROCHA, G.; FORMOSO, C. O USO DO PROJETO BASEADO EM EVIDÊNCIAS PARA MELHORAR O AMBIENTES DE COZINHA E ÁREA DE SERVIÇO DE EMPREENDIMENTOS HABITACIONAIS DE BAIXA RENDA. Em: , 2012. Anais [...]., 2012. p. 12.
LOGSDON, L.; FABRÍCIO, M. Instrumentos associados de apoio ao processo de projeto de moradias sociais. Ambiente Construído, v. 20, n. 2, p. 401–423, 2020.
OLIVEIRA, A.; BRITO, D. Living Labs: A experiência Portuguesa TT - Living labs: The Portuguese experience. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad, v. 8, n. 23, p. 201–229, 2013.
PASKALEVA, K.; COOPER, I. Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence. Technovation, v. 106, p. 102311, 2021.
PASKALEVA, K.; COOPER, I.; LINDE, P.; PETERSON, B.; GÖTZ, C. Stakeholder Engagement in the Smart City: Making Living Labs Work. Em: RODRÍGUEZ-BOLÍVAR, M. (org.). Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. (Public Administration and Information Technology). v. 8, p. 115–145. E-book. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-03167-5_7. Acesso em: 4 maio 2020.
POORTINGA, W.; JONES, N.; LANNON, S.; JENKINS, H. Social and health outcomes following upgrades to a national housing standard: a multilevel analysis of a five-wave repeated cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, v. 17, n. 1, p. 927, 2017.
SOUZA, L.; KOWALTOWSKI, D.; WOOLNER, P. Parâmetros de projeto e métodos visuais APOs: estudo de duas escolas no Reino Unido. Ambiente Construído, v. 20, n. 3, p. 199–223, 2020.
STEEN, K.; VAN BUEREN, E. Urban Living Labs: A Living Lab Way of Working, 2017.
TANG, T.; HÄMÄLÄINEN, M. Beyond Open Innovation: the Living Lab Way of ICT Innovation., v.4, 2014. Disponível em: /paper/Beyond-Open-Innovation-%3A-the-Living-Lab-Way-of-ICT-Tang-H%C3%A4m%C3%A4l%C3%A4inen/30e960704f5dd52234f6e82f5c9381e2cf3f8eae. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2020.
