IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE BOAS PRÁTICAS QUE CONTRIBUEM PARA A DIMINUIÇÃO DA VARIABILIDADE DOS PROCESSOS

Authors

  • Herbert Melo Cruz
  • Débora de Gois Santos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v17i1.1481

Keywords:

Best practices, Causes, Variability

Abstract

One of the major challenges faced by construction management is the implementation of activities within schedule, because variability frequently. This research study aims to identify the best practices that contribute to reduce processes variability. The methodology consisted of direct observations with nine construction sites visited. The study analyzed reinforced concrete works (conventional), structural masonry and concrete walls cast on-site. The results showed that 21 best practices were raised in the construction sites and they were relationship with reduction of 42% of the causes of variability. The study also showed deficiencies, on the part of managers, to deal with the impacts of process variability. The best practices are shown as an alternative to reduce the impacts and consequences of this specific type of variability, but still inefficiently. The results were part of Master's dissertation whose theme refers to the analysis of the causes of process variability in different construction systems.

References

CRUZ. H. M. Análise das Causas da Variabilidade do Tempo de Execução dosProcessos em Diferentes Sistemas Construtivos. São Cristóvão, 2017. 150 f.

Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) Programa de Pós-Graduação emEngenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2017.

CRUZ, H. M.; SANTOS, D. de; MENDES, L. A. Causas da variabilidade do tempo deexecução dos processos em diferentes sistemas construtivos. Ambiente Construído,Porto Alegre, v. 18, n. 1, p. 51-67, jan./mar. 2018.

DE FILIPPI, G. A.; MELHADO, S. B. Um Estudo Sobre as Causas de Atrasos de Obras deEmpreendimentos Imobiliários na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. AmbienteConstruído, Porto Alegre, v. 15, n. 3, p. 161-173, jul./set. 2015.

HOPP, W. J.; SPEARMAN, M.L. Factory Physics: foundations of manufacturingmanagement. Boston: Irwin Mc Graw-Hill, 1996.

KOSKELA, L. Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. TechnicalReport nº. 72. CIFE. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering. Stanford University,1992, 87p.

KOSKELA, L. An Exploration Towards a Production Theory and Its Application toConstruction. Espoo, 2000. 296 f. Thesis (Doctor) Technical Research Centre ofFinland, Espoo, 2000.

MAUÉS, L. M. F. et al. Construction Delays: a case study in the Brazilian Amazon.

Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 3, p. 167-181, jul./set. 2017.

SANTOS, A. dos; FORMOSO, C. T.; TOOKEY, F. E. Expanding the Meaning ofStandardization with in Construction Processes. The TQM Magazine, v. 14, n. 1, p.25-33, 2002.

WAMBEKE, B. W.; HSIANG, S. M.; LIU, M. Causes of Variation in Construction ProjectTask Starting Times and Duration. Journal of Construction Engineering andManagement, v. 137, n. 9, p. 663-677, 2011.

Published

2018-11-12

How to Cite

CRUZ, Herbert Melo; SANTOS, Débora de Gois. IDENTIFICAÇÃO DE BOAS PRÁTICAS QUE CONTRIBUEM PARA A DIMINUIÇÃO DA VARIABILIDADE DOS PROCESSOS. In: NATIONAL MEETING OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, 17., 2018. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2018. p. 1370–1379. DOI: 10.46421/entac.v17i1.1481. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/entac/article/view/1481. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

(Inativa) Gestão e Economia da Construção

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.