Study of Project compatibility using the traditional method and using BIM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v20i1.6385

Keywords:

Project Compatibilidty, BIM, Interoperability

Abstract

Every construction project starts from the design stage, from which crucial information is obtained to plan and budget the works. Incompatibilities between the projects of the disciplines involved are recurrent and directly interfere with the execution of the work if not resolved in advance. With technological advances, the potential of Building Information Modeling – or construction information modeling (BIM) – can be seen to make compatibility more agile and faster, in addition to, mainly, reducing conflicts between projects through interoperability. Given this context, this work aims to present the project compatibility process using the traditional method and using BIM, presenting the main incompatibilities and difficulties in implementing BIM for compatibility. To this end, a case study was carried out of two adjacent works being carried out simultaneously. The first work was made compatible using the traditional method with overlaying 2D CAD drawings and the second work using BIM. For the latter, a federated model created for three disciplines in Revit 2023 was exported to Navisworks Manage 2023. For theoretical foundation, a simplified systematic mapping of the literature was carried out. Of the main results, making compatible using the traditional method in contrast to applying BIM for the same activity attest to the use of BIM as superior to the traditional method, highlighting the savings of at least 50% of the time spent and a number of conflicts detected 41 times higher. The company's level of BIM maturity was also verified, justified by a cultural problem to be overcome, since only 33% of the projects contracted for the works were originally developed in BIM and to the detriment of the unavailability of skilled labor for hiring.

Author Biographies

Thallita Barros da Silva, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Graduanda em Engenheira Civil pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas (Maceió, AL)

Adriana de Oliveira Santos Weber , Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Doutorado em Entenharia Civil pela UFRGS (Porto Alegre, RS). Professora Associada da Universidade Federal de Alagoas.

Ariana Rosella Cervino, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Acadêmica de Engenharia Civil na Universidade Federal de Alagoas (Maceió, AL)

Samira Braga Melo, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Acadêmica em Engenharia Civil

Yelli Katerine Oliveira da Silva, Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Acadêmica de Engenharia Civil

References

HERRERA, RF; MOURGUES, C.; ALARCON, LF; PELLICER, E. Comparing Team Interactions in Traditional and BIM-Lean Design

Management. Buildings 2021, 11, 447.

MELHADO, S. B. et al. Coordenação de projetos de edificações. São Paulo. O Nome da Rosa, 2005.

GTBIM: GRUPO TÉCNICO BIM – ASBEA. Guia AsBEA Boas Práticas em BIM – Fascículo 2: Fluxo de Projetos em BIM: Planejamento e

Execução. São Paulo, agosto de 2015.

FERREIRA, R. C.; SANTOS, E. T. CARACTERÍSTICAS DA REPRESENTAÇÃO 2D E SUAS LIMITAÇÕES PARA A COMPATIBILIZAÇÃO

ESPACIAL. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 36-51, 2007. DOI: 10.4237/gtp.v2i2.39. Disponível em:

www.revistas.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/50918>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2023.

CHAHROUR, R.; HAFEEZ, MA; AHMAD, AM; SULIEMAN, HI; DAWOOD, H.; RODRÍGUEZ-TREJO, S.; DAWOOD, N. Cost-benefit analysis

of BIM-enabled design clash detection & resolution. Constr. Gerenciar Econ. 39, p. 55–72, 2021.

ADDOR, M. R.; CASTANHO, M. D. A.; CAMBIAGHI, H.; DELATORRE, J. P. M.; NARDELLI, E. S.; OLIVEIRA, A. L. Colocando o “i” no BIM.

Revista Arq. Urb., São Paulo, n. 4, p. 104-115, 2010. Disponível em: <https://www.usjt.br/arq.urb/numero_04/

arqurb4_06_miriam.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2023.

MACIEL, A. C. F., SOUZA JUNIOR, D. A., & OLIVEIRA, P. H. Detecção de incompatibilidades de projetos entre metodologia

convencional 2D E BIM: um estudo comparativo. Revista de Gestão e Projetos (GeP), 2022. 97-116.

AKPONEWARE, A.O.; ADAMU, Z.A. Clash Detection or Clash Avoidance? An Investigation into Coordination Problems in 3D BIM.

Buildings 2017, 7, 75. Disponível em: < https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/7/3/75>. Acesso em: 03 ago. 2023.

EASTMAN, C.; TEICHOLZ, P.; SACKS, R.; LISTON, K. Manual de BIM. Um guia de modelagem da informação da construção para

arquitetos, engenheiros, gerentes, construtores e incorporadores. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2014. 483p.

CZMOCH, I.; PEKALA, A. Traditional Design versus BIM Based Design. Elsevier, Poland, 91, 2014, p. 210-215.

ALMASHJARY, B.; ZOLKAFLI, U. K.; RAZAK, A. S. A. Establishing key factors towards implementing integrated building information

modeling (bim) in aec industry: Malaysia study. Journal of Building performance. V. 11, p. 116-127, 2020.

JIA, J.; SUN, J.; WANG, Z.; XU, T. The construction of BIM application value system for residential buildings’ design stage in China

based on traditional DBB mode. International high-performance built environment conference, Amsterdam, Procedia

Engineering, 2017. 180, p. 851 – 858.

EADIE, R., ODEYINKA, H., BROWNE, M., MCKEOWN, C., & YOHANIS, M. (2014). Building Information Modelling Adoption: An

Analysis of the Barriers to Implementation. Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 2014, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–101.

BARQAWI, M.; CHONG, H.; JONESCU, E. "A Review of Employer-Caused Delay Factors in Traditional and Building Information

Modeling (BIM)-Enabled Projects: Research Framework". Advances in Civil Engineering, London, vol. 2021, p. 24, 2021.

FAMADICO, J. J. Building Information Modeling in the Architecture and Construction Industry. Advances in Technology Innovation.

Vol. 8, nº 2, p. 121-135.

GARTOUMI, K. I.; ABOUSSALEH, M.; ZAKI, S. (2021). Building Information Modelling in Morocco: Quo Vadis. 2021. p. 479-483.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DOS ESCRITÓRIOS DE ARQUITETURA - AsBEA. Guia AsBEA Boas Práticas em BIM – Fascículo 1:

Estruturação do Escritório de Projeto Para a Implantação do BIM. São Paulo, 2013.

HAN, N.; YUE, Z.F.; LU, Y.F. Detecção de colisão de tubos e dutos de instalações de construção com base na tecnologia BIM, em

Pesquisa de materiais avançados. Trans Tech Publ., 2012, pp. 312–317.

RILEY, D. R. et al. Métricas de custo-benefício para coordenação de projetos de sistemas mecânicos, elétricos e hidráulicos em

edifícios de vários andares. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), pp. 877–889, 2005.

STAUB-FRENCH, S.; KHANZODE, A. (2007) 'Modelagem 3D e 4D para coordenação de projeto e construção: problemas e lições

aprendidas'. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 12(26), pp. 381– 407, 2007.

WANG, L. Knowledge formalization and reuse in BIM-based mechanical, electrical and plumbing design coordination in new

construction projects using data mining techniques. Tese. Texas, agosto 2014. Disponível em: <https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/

handle/2152/28692>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2023.

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

SILVA, Thallita Barros da; WEBER , Adriana de Oliveira Santos; CERVINO, Ariana Rosella; BRAGA MELO, Samira; SILVA, Yelli Katerine Oliveira da. Study of Project compatibility using the traditional method and using BIM. In: NATIONAL MEETING OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, 20., 2024. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2024. p. 1–12. DOI: 10.46421/entac.v20i1.6385. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/entac/article/view/6385. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.