Analysis of InfoVis Proposals for a Built Environment Activity Allocation Software

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/sbqp.v8i.3292

Keywords:

InfoVis, Readability, Codesign, Brainsketching, Activities allocation

Abstract

Information Visualization (InfoVis) solutions are critical to improving the understanding and use of complex data. The paper presents the codesign workshop results, which used brainsketching to elaborate on InfoVis solutions for the under-development software of allocating activities in the built environment. The objective is to analyze the readability strategies presented by the developed solutions and thus base the next development steps. The participants were introduced to the software's functioning and the data they had to represent visually. Two multidisciplinary teams, formed by designers and architects, discuss, and propose visualization ideas, communicating through sketches and speech. They received support materials to co-design activity, such as a data sample – obtained by mapping a true allocation in a University Hospital emergency room – cards with reference views and sketch material. The results achieved by the two teams present characteristics that fit into two strategies for reducing the complexity of information visualization postulated in the consulted theory. The discussion of these results contributes to the theoretical framework of InfoVis practices and offers insights into visualization in the software under development.

Author Biographies

Lucas Melchiori Pereira, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo

Doutorado em Ciências pelo Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismos da Universidade de São Paulo. Pós-doutorando na Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo- SP, Brasil).

Sheila Walbe Ornstein, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo

Doutorado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo pela Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo. Professora titular na Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo - SP, Brasil).

Leandro Manuel Reis Velloso, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo

Doutorado em Design pela Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo. Professor na Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo - SP, Brasil).

References

CAIXETA, Michele Caroline Bueno Ferrari; FABRICIO, Márcio Minto. Physical-digital model for co-design in healthcare buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, [S. l.], v. 34, n. November, p. 101900, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101900. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101900.

DÖRK, Marian; MÜLLER, Boris; STANGE, Jan-Erik; HERSENI, Johannes; DITTRICH, Katja. Co-Designing Visualizations for Information Seeking and Knowledge Management. Open Information Science, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 217–235, 2020. DOI: 10.1515/opis-2020-0102. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2020-0102/html.

DORST, Kees. The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 6, p. 521–532, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.

HAMMOND, Tracy. Dialectical Creativity: Sketch-Negate-Create. In: Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. p. 91–108. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_6. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_6.

KIM, Tanyoung; DISALVO, Carl. Speculative visualization: a new rhetoric for communicating public concerns. Design Research Society, [S. l.], p. 7–9, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.designresearchsociety.org/docs-procs/DRS2010/PDF/066.pdf.

KLEINSMANN, Maaike; VALKENBURG, Rianne. Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design Studies, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 4, p. 369–386, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003.

MANZINI, Ezio. Design Culture and Dialogic Design. Design Issues, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 52–59, 2016. DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00364. Disponível em: www.magno-design.com.

PEREIRA, Lucas Melchiori. Desenho Organizacional para a Integração de Projetos através da Modelagem da Informação em Processos Colaborativos. , 2014. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315803571_Desenho_organizacional_para_a_integracao_de_projetos_atraves_da_modelagem_da_informacao_em_processos_colaborativos_dissertacao_de_mestrado.

PEREIRA, Lucas Melchiori; ORNSTEIN, Sheila Walbe. A Systematic Literature Review on Healthcare Facility Evaluation Methods. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 338–361, 2023. DOI: 10.1177/19375867231166094. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19375867231166094.

PEREIRA, Lucas Melchiori; ORNSTEIN, Sheila Walbe; SOARES, Vitória Sanches Lemes; AMARO, Jean; FRANÇA, Ana Judite Galbiatti Limongi. Congruence Mapping of the Activity Flows Allocated in Built Environments: A Pilot Application of Under-Development Software in an Emergency-Care Service. Applied Sciences, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 1599, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/app13031599.

SANDERS, Elizabeth B. N.; STAPPERS, Pieter Jan. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 5–18, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15710880701875068.

SCHOFFELEN, Jessica; CLAES, Sandy; HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; MARTENS, Sarah; CHUA, Alvin; MOERE, Andrew Vande. Visualising things. Perspectives on how to make things public through visualisation. CoDesign, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 3–4, p. 179–192, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2015.1081240. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081240.

SPRAGUE, David; TORY, Melanie. Exploring how and why people use visualizations in casual contexts: Modeling user goals and regulated motivations. Information Visualization, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 106–123, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1473871611433710.

STEEN, Marc. Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination. Design Issues, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 16–28, 2013. DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00207. Disponível em: https://direct.mit.edu/desi/article/29/2/16-28/69111.

STOMPFF, Guido; SMULDERS, Frido; HENZE, Lilian. Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams. Design Studies, [S. l.], v. 47, p. 187–214, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.004. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.004.

VAN DER LUGT, Remko. Brainsketching and how it differs from brainstorming. Creativity and Innovation Management, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 43–54, 2002. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8691.00235.

VISCHER, Jacqueline C. Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building Research & Information, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 231–240, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/09613210801936472. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801936472.

WANG, Jin-Yi; RAMBERG, Robert; KUOPPALA, Hannu. User Participatory Sketching: A Complementary Approach to Gather User Requirements. APCHI 2012: The 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction, [S. l.], n. June 2017, p. 481–490, 2012.

Published

2023-10-28

How to Cite

Pereira, L. M. ., Ornstein, S. W. ., & Velloso, L. M. R. . (2023). Analysis of InfoVis Proposals for a Built Environment Activity Allocation Software. SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE QUALIDADE DE PROJETO DO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.46421/sbqp.v8i.3292

Issue

Section

PRÁTICA - ATUAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL E VALORIZAÇÃO DO PROJETO

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.