Traditional school environment versus Montessori school environment

Authors

  • Luísa Amaral Régio Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Britto Correa Federal University of Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46421/entac.v20i1.6369

Keywords:

School environment., Traditional school., Montessori school.

Abstract

School plays an important role in the socialization and knowledge construction
process of students, influencing not only their interpersonal relationships, but also
their interaction with the physical environment. The objective of this work was to
carry out a comparative analysis between traditional versus Montessori school
environments, seeking to identify their differences, the challenges faced and the
potential contributions of each model to educational development. An exploratory
bibliographical review was carried out, followed by an analysis of school projects that
adopt traditional and Montessori pedagogies. As a result, traditional school
environments follow a rigid hierarchical structure, emphasizing the transmission of
knowledge through lectures and standardized assessments. On the other hand,
Montessori environments favor interactive and collaborative approaches, promoting
active learning, problem solving and creativity. This study presents the strengths and
limitations of each proposal, aiming to guide transformations in school environments,
making them more aligned with the needs of contemporary society.

Author Biography

Britto Correa, Federal University of Pelotas

He holds a degree in Architecture from the Federal University of Pelotas (1980) and a PhD in Architecture from the Polytechnic University of Madrid (2001). She is a specialist in Advanced Architectural Construction Technologies from the same Spanish university, where she was also a visiting professor. She is currently an associate professor at the Federal University of Pelotas, teaching subjects and supervising students in undergraduate and postgraduate courses in Architecture and Urbanism, where she also develops research, some with international funding. She has experience in the area of ​​Architecture and Urbanism, with an emphasis on Architectural Design and Construction Technology, working mainly on the following topics: lighting, interior architecture, urban nature and elderly-friendly cities.

References

AZEVEDO, G. A. N. Arquitetura escolar e educação: um modelo conceitual de

abordagem interacionista. Tese de Doutorado. Programa: Engenharia da Produção.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2002.

KOWALTOWSKI, D. C. C. K. Arquitetura escolar: o projeto do ambiente de ensino. São

Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2011.

LIMA, S. W. M. Arquitetura e educação. [s. l.]: Studio Nobel, 1995.

ORNSTEIN, Sheila & ROMÉRO, Marcelo. Avaliação Pós-Ocupação do Ambiente

Construído. São Paulo: Studio Nobel: FAU/USP,1992.

SARMENTO, T. S., GOMES, A.S. Design de Ambiente Escolar para Aprendizagem

Criativa. Pipa Comunicação, 2021.

SANOFF, Henry. School Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.

TAYLOR, A. P. Linking Architecture and Education: sustainable design for learning

environments. New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press, 2009.

PEARLMAN, B. Designing New Learning Environments to Support 21st Century Skills. In:

BELLANCA, J. A. 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. [s.l.] Solution Tree

Press, 2011.

Published

2024-10-07

How to Cite

AMARAL RÉGIO, Luísa; BRITTO CORREA, Celina Maria. Traditional school environment versus Montessori school environment. In: NATIONAL MEETING OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, 20., 2024. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: ANTAC, 2024. DOI: 10.46421/entac.v20i1.6369. Disponível em: https://eventos.antac.org.br/index.php/entac/article/view/6369. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.