SATISFACTION WITH THE SIZE OF HOUSING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors

  • Amanda P. Maciel Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Karin P. M. W. Teixeira Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Alfredo Iarozinski Neto Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.438156

Keywords:

Residential satisfaction, Housing size, Covid-19 pandemic, Survey

Abstract

This article assesses how the Covid-19 pandemic affected individuals perception of satisfaction with the size of their house. It also examines whether the increase in hours in the home is a factor capable of affecting this perception. For this, a Survey was carried out, in which 128 questionnaires were distributed to residents of the metropolitan region of Curitiba. The collected data were treated by means of multivariate analysis and descriptive analysis. The results showed that the size, in isolation, does not seem to be a factor of great impact in the loss of satisfaction with the size of the environment. However, the increase in the length of stay of individuals in their homes after the onset of the pandemic proved to be a significant factor. Therefore, this study contributes to the understanding of the new perceptions generated by the pandemic, placing the time that the individual needs to remain at home as an important aspect to be considered in the new housing projects.

References

ADEDIRAN, A. et al. Housing Quality Standard and Covid-19 Pandemic: A Call for Attention inNigeria. Journal of Science, Engineering, Technology and Management, v. 2,n. 2, p. 1-10,2020.

COUCH, D. L.; O'SULLIVAN, B.; MALATZKY, C. What COVID‐19 could mean for the future of“work from home”: The provocations of three women in the academy. Gender, Work &Organization, v. 28, p. 266-275, 2021.

DALMORO, M.; VIEIRA, K. M. Dilemas na construção de escalas Tipo Likert: o número de itense a disposição influenciam nos resultados? Revista gestão organizacional, v. 6, n. 3, p. 161-174, 2013.

FREITAS, H. et al. O método de pesquisa survey. Revista de Administração da Universidade de SãoPaulo, São Paulo, v. 35, n. 3, p. 105-112, jul./set. 2000. Disponível em:<http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/16542/o-metodo-de-pesquisa-survey/i/pt-br>. Acessoem: 15 de fev. 2021GUEDES, T. A. et al. Estatística descritiva. Projeto de ensino aprender fazendo estatística, Maringá,p. 1-49, 2005. Disponível em:<https://www.ime.usp.br/~rvicente/Guedes_etal_Estatistica_Descritiva.pdf> Acesso em: 27 de fev.2021.

HAIR, J. F. et al. Análise multivariada. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.

JIANG, W.; TIMMERMANS, H. J. P. Residential Satisfaction in Renovated Historic Blocks in TwoChinese Cities. The Professional Geographer, v. 73, n. 2, p. 333-347, 2021.

LUND, S. et al. The future of work after Covid-19. McKinsey Global Institute. Executive summary,2021. p. 1-32. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2021.

MADEDDU, M.; CLIFFORD, B. Housing quality, Permitted Development and the role of regulationafter COVID-19. Town Planning Review, v. 92, n.1, p. 41-48, 2020.

MEGAHED, N. A.; GHONEIM, E. M. Antivirus-built environment: Lessons learned from Covid-19pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society, Port Said, v. 61, p. 102350, 2020. ISSN 2210-6707, 2020.

RAYNOR, K.; WIESEL, I.; BENTLEY, B. Why staying home during a pandemic can increase risk forsome. Melbourne, Victoria: The University of Melbourne, Affordable Housing Hallmark ResearchInitiative, 2020. (Discussion paper).

ROSSONI, L. Covid-19, Organizações, Trabalho em Casa e Produção Científica. Revista Eletrônicade Ciência Administrativa, v. 19, n. 2, p. 158-168, 2020.

SHARFUDDIN, S. The world after Covid-19. The Round Tacoucble, v. 109, n. 3, p. 247-257, 2020.

WANG, F.; WANG, D. Changes in residential satisfaction after home relocation: A longitudinal studyin Beijing, China. Urban Studies, v. 57, n. 3, p. 583-601, 2020.

Published

2021-11-19

How to Cite

P. Maciel, A. ., P. M. W. Teixeira, K. ., & Iarozinski Neto, A. . (2021). SATISFACTION WITH THE SIZE OF HOUSING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE QUALIDADE DE PROJETO DO AMBIENTE CONSTRUÍDO, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29327/sbqp2021.438156

Issue

Section

Projetos de edifícios e equipamentos públicos de interesse social

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.